Yes, Rockingham Superior Court Judge, John Lewis, handed don his decision today. In the 13page Order, he States that the Osborns "have no property rights" to the Right of Way across Mrs. Davis land, as Maggie has so often claimed.
Judge Lewis further stated that the Osborn's trespassed upon Mrs. Davis' land, and diminished it's value with their "negligent excavating and cutting of trees". The Court also recognized Mrs. Davis' attempts to stop this effective theft of her land, by proscription, by asking Mrs. Osborn to stop, which Maggie not so kindly dismissed. The Court also stated that this WAS a claim for which enhanced damages, for the market value of the trees could be awarded, but he failed to do so, as Mrs. Osborn did not seem to have any idea of the exact number, type or size of trees removed, nor could Mrs. Davis Prove what existed before the Osborn's wanton destruction commenced.
Mrs. Davis has the right to do anything she wishes with the Osborns illegal driveway. The Court also enjoined the Osborns from using the driveway whether Mrs. Davis bars it or not. Continued use of this driveway on the part of the Osborns could result in trespassing charges.
This decision creates a dilemma for the town. Normally for the size lot, and location up on Valcat ln. a permit would only be issued to build a 1,400 sq.ft. home with a sprinkler system. The Osborns were granted a variance on the condition that they had direct access to Chase Island rd. to build a 2,600 sq.ft. house, with a sprinkler system. After obtaining that variance, by submitting plans to that effect, the Osborn's apparently had the Architectural firm of Silverlake Assoc. design a home of over 4,000 sq.ft. which NOW stands upon this site. This is acknowledged by the town, which states a 4,000 sq.ft. home on their tax card.
The Town has obtained an eviction Order for the Osborn's home due to their defiance in adhering to the building permit to which they agreed. The Osborn's are attempting to appeal the amount of the fine and attornies fees to the Supreme Court. Now the Town which has fined and Ordered Mr. Mason to tear down the overbuilt portion of his home, just around the corner from the Osborns, is now faced with a home that does NOT have a sprinkler system, and is overbuilt by 2,800 sq.ft.
Now that the Osborns no longer have access to the road that allowed them to overbuild, nor do they have a sprinkler system, to satisfy their building permit.
This leaves the town to decide if they Order Osborns to tear down the overbuilt portion of their home as they have done to Mr. Mason. or do they simply refuse to enforce zoning ordinances for anybody.
"Oh what tangled webs we weave, when first we set out to deceive"
Atkinson Town Hall
The Norman Rockwellian picture of Atkinson
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
100 comments:
Still see the Osborns leaving their home in the morning. So much for eviction. The town would never have the guts to have the Osborns tear down their home. The lake is just stuck with another overbuilt McMansion that is not the most attractive structure.
Congratulations on getting your property back Mrs Davis. You stood and fought for your land and your rights and won. You are a great lady. I admire your courage. You refused to be bullied. I admire and respect what you did.
You are a great lady!
If you are expecting consistency and rule of law from our selectmen, you may have to wait a long time.
They a glad handers not statesmen.
Did anyone else see last night's eagle tribune police report for Plaistow?
Good for Mrs. Davis, she prevailed in getting her land back. However the statement about the towns involvement is false. The access to the Osborn lot had nothing to do with the size of the house or granting of the variance. This was a civil matter.
You can find the facts in the minutes on the ZBA web site. Do your homework before you report.
It is my opinion the BOS should deal with all citizens equally under the law. It the house is larger than the permit granted, then the house size must be adjusted back. If the driveway is not legally theirs and they used that to warrant a larger home, it seems logical to adjust the size of the home downward once again.
What is important here and it is very important: The laws must be applied equally by the BOS to all citizens of Atkinson with no favoritism whatsoever. Mrs. Osborn was a member of the ZBA zoning board at the time. That makes it even more of a problem if the BOS doesn't enforce the law.
What are you talking about. Please get the fact before you comment. This has nothing to do with the ZBA. Can you site the law you are referring to?
The ZBA didn't want Mrs. Osborn on the Board. That was Jack's doing. The Chairman tried to have her removed.
All the laws, rules, RSAs must be enforced in the town. Favoritism should play no part. If a home is built larger than the permit, the BOS must take prompt and swift action to correct the violation. It is a matter of integrity and honesty as well.
That is only MY opinion? I hope not.
Can you give facts of what "laws, rules, rsa's, lacking enforcement in this case. Quit blaming the town. Favoritism had no role in this case. Where are the facts?
Hey anon 844,
Doesnt look like any of the bloggers want to play, maybe that's cause there are only a few and they are hoping the story doesnt leak. HAHAHA- stay tuned...
HMM, Mr Acciard usually has a few things to say re: The Osbournes, what's the matter Mark, do think if you hide for a bit you won't be exposed? Hmmm
Imagine if Atkinson's finest arrested 'the one and only"? I bet the State police and the AG's office would already be in town setting up shop to start the harassment investigation. I'm glad Plaistow made the arrest and kept our boys in blue out of hot water.
Is it true that Mr Acciard is a new member of the Ethics Commssion? HMM
I have a great idea for a form of transportation for the Conflict of Interest Committee. You guessed it.. Bennetts cadi parked in the rear of Clown Hall. It will be quite similar to the tiny car at the circus just a bit bigger for all the heavy hitters that will be exiting it.
ET/police log March 23rd; Warrant arrest: Mark Acciard, 49, 6 Christine Drive, Atkinson. charges not listed, 12:19 p.m. copy available at PDC
!0:09, I think what is being referred to, is the fact that the Osborns were granted a variance to build to 2,600 sq.ft. and they instead built a 4,000+sq.ft. house. Mr. Mason overbuilt his home as well, and the town took him to Court, and won, ordering him to tear down the portion in excess of his building permit, and assessing him a couple hundred thousand in rolling fines as well.
This same situation now exists with the Osborn home.
I would guess that is what the poster is talking about.
11:13, Exposed for what, pray tell?
Atkinson's finest. Right. Yah mean the do-nothin's? Look the other way, move along, nothing happening in this here town. Nothing we want to deal with anyway. Look away.
No, I am not. I declined my write in appointment to the School District budget committee.
As for the "arrest" I went to Plaistow PD to pick up my front license plate which had fallen off my car at Timberlane, and was kindly informed that a Derry never received the money I mailed in to pay for an inspection sticker ticket.
I paid it. and went on my way.
No ethics issue there, try again.
Glad to hear all is well Mark.
Sorry to hear that you are not on a committee.
Can Mrs. Davis sell the driveway to the Osborns for a couple of hundred thou?
MAccaird: Mason and Osborn were very different violations. One was built without a permit and setback violation. A fine was assessed along with removal of addition. The other a building code violation and code enforcement violation. A fine assessed and building violation enforced.
What did the town miss?
Didn't Osborn also violate set back to the lake and also was not permitted to build that size house.
It seems worse to me than the Mason case, especially since Mason did not roll over his neighbors and violate their land, stress them out for more than a year.
Anony.2:04, those are not town claims, they are false blog claims. All records are available at the town hall, for those who want to be well informed. No set back violations. The Osborn home did not impose on any other neighbor. The Davis suit was the Right of Way that belongs to Davis and Orlando. Has nothing to do with the house.
Mason couldn't meet set back from their neighbors, and was a bigger threat to neighbors. That is why removal is being enforced.
All of the above is available in the building department.
Being that you are now a resident of Derry, you really should try to keep up with your legal responsibilities to your new town Mark.
My residency is in Atkinson as it has been for 44 years. No matter how much certain people wish it to be different.
Right. And bears don't shit in the woods. So when you lay your head down on your pillow at night, is it next to your wife or next to your tenants?
Mark could lay his head down in the back seat of his car located in Florida, and he would still be a resident of Atkinson. Where do you lay your head at night, next to someone else's wife?
5:18 ??? Is that the best you can do?
@5:18, yes, yours.
Now I really pitty you.
How can Mark vote in Atkinson if his cars are registered in Derry? His Children go to school in Derry! His tenants would have the right to vote in Atkinson.
If he is voting in Atkinson it may be fraud!
If you want someone to pity, look in the mirror. When someone spends their nights in a different town, they aren't a resident of Atkinson.
My opinion. Hope the trees get put back on the Davis property right away. It isn't right to cut down neighbors trees, or poison their trees or damage their property. It is just plain wrong in anybodys book.
Mark please clarify where do you register your car? Where did you vote?
To Anon March 24, 2011 5:49 PM
My wife has been dead for three years now. You claim you are banging her in the grave. Now I know you are a town official. Her memory is special to me and you want to destroy that. What a piece of shit you are.
I don't care where Mark lives, but you are the lowest human being on the face of this earth.
That's not my opinion, that's a fact! May you rought in HELL!!!!
Read what Mark wrote earlier:
"..Derry never received the money I mailed in to pay for an inspection sticker ticket."
This is nothing to do with where he lives. "Derry" can only mean "Derry District Court." He was driving his car and got pulled over for an expired or missing inspection sticker. He got a ticket and mailed his fine to the court that handles traffic violations for that town. It could have been Derry, but it might have been Londonderry, Chester or Sandown, as the Derry District Court handles traffic tickets for those towns. It's nothing to do with where he lives and everything to do with where he got pulled over.
Based on this there is no reason to believe that he doesn't live in Atkinson.
Anon @ 10:06PM,
Spare me your faux outrage. We're both anon posters. I know as much about you as you know about me, which is to say nothing. Had I made those comments knowing that your wife has been dead, your position would have merit. Obviously I know nothing of the sort nor do I know if your post is truthful or if you are just going for the poor me angle. You want to take a shot at me by suggesting I'm sleeping with someone else's wife besides my own, you best be prepared for a response in kind. As they say, if you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
There is such hatred in this town and I am really tired of it. No wonder that no one wants to volunteer for anything and keeps their distance from the town officials. This is a disgrace!
I also have to add that the town reaps what it sows. They target people, deny services, openly exhibit bias and hatred toward selected residents.
We got rid of a few bad apples but we have a few more to contend with now. They are making all kinds of back dorr deals and plots against others and this has got to stop. If it doesn't, we are all in for more lawsutis and turmoil and disgrace.
I thought they settled the recent lawsuits and just shook hands and walked away.
That's funny. The AG's office tells me that I am still an Atkinson resident, as I have been for 44 years including the 17 years spent traveling around the world with the USAF.
As for the know it all telling the town different, Frank, My home, cars, trucks and business are all in Atkinson, all my taxes are paid to Atkinson. I am neither living owning, leasing, or registered to vote anywhere else.
Thanks to our town officials, and school district officials which my questions have pissed off, I have had to prove this to the AG's office twice in the last year.
As most of you know, My wife and kids moved to Derry after someone vandalized my home and car. A high price to pay for telling the truth about a corrupt town official, but that evidently is what my home town has turned into.
And those of you who have supported, assisted, enabled, and otherwise encouraged, either directly or indirectly these despicable acts should be ashamed of yourselves.
But in Atkinson, political loyalty trumps truth.
You never answered the question Mark. Where do you sleep at night? Are you implying you are spending your nights in Atkinson and that you and your wife are separated? Are you implying that you are not renting your house on Christine? Something sounds fishy about your claim.
To 8:38; There was a settlement offer, a mutual release of claims, that the town's attornies wanted to do in steps as the myriad parties agreed. The Plaintiffs signed settlement with Phil Consentino, thinking that the rest of the parties were days away from signing. After Phil signed the Selectmen told the Attornies being paid by the towns insurance co. they would not continue with the resolution. This, from my understanding, was what led to the town's insurer dropping coverage, and the town resolving to hire new counsel.
This new counsel is also representing Frank Polito in his personal lawsuit against Artus/Brownfield et. al. Claiming that their lawsuit about his 91-A violations at deliberative session were frivolous.
So, We have a release against the Chief obtained by honest brokering renegged upon by the selectmen, who are, once again, willing to commit our taxpayer dollars to defending the indefensible, and paying the personal legal fees of a former town official.
Wish they would have paid my legal expenses when I WON against the town/chief four times.
Where do YOU sleep at night? Do you visit your short squat old woman while her husband is off on travel? Do you ask your subordinates to drive you there and pick you up later, in a town vehicle? Do you know they have photos?
Well, my faith has never been in the selctmen, especially snake eyes, or should I say toad face. The town is funding a lawsuit with two different lawyers to represent Polito, no longer an official, Polito started the mess at session and he is so damned hot headed (per Bennit) that he'll never give up.
Thanks Frank. Surprised to be alone?
I sleep in my bed in my home in Atkinson next to my wife whom I love dearly. As far as the rest of your comment, I have no idea what you are talking about. The question isn't about me though, it's about Mark and where he claims to live. Mark couldn't possibly be fibbing now could he???
The statement was certainly NOT about Mark, it was about the long time romance of two public figures who apparently do not care who sees them crooning in public.
Going around town hall today is the rumor that the board sucessfuly destroyed the conflict commitee again.
Can we please get back to the comments on this article, and not deviate about certain people? Anyway hip hip hooray for Davis win against her neighbor. I dont understand how, or why Osborn's would continue to fight the town, they need to eat the costs, do what is needed in order for the family to move back in. I do agree, that matters have to be dealt with by the town, in regards to the size home that is built, besides a sprinkler system. The town needs to prove to its taxpayers it means business, nobody better screw around anymore. A similiar case happened in Salem on Arlington Lake, and that Town showed it meant business. It wasn't a teardown, but, land had to be rebuilt, and fined. Also if I were the neighbor who is supposed to tear down their addition, I would consult an attorney on their next step, its still "Not Fair" anyway you look at it. You must treat all the same.
Sure is unfortunate that no one
has any pictures of the Davis property before the trees were cut. Come on neighbors, it's time to help Mrs Davis out here. Timmy Dziechowski says replacing her trees would costs the Osborns a
pretty penny. Consider it your Green or Habitat Protection Initiative for the year. Find some pictures.
Can you say "Google Earth"? Can you say Atkinson paid-for "Pictometry" used by ZBA and Building Insp.? Can you say "Google Street View"?
Tim D. will know what the town owns for overhead imagery.
I am more interested in WHY the selectmen are paying for Frank Polito to sue Brownfield and Artus?
That is NOT what my tax dollars should be going to
This reminds me of when Jack and Phil asked Frank to sue the Town he moderated for over fire hydrant Boyle was giving to the town behind the Academy.
Frank was so smug, and the court threw it out!
I do not think the Town should be paying the legal bill for Polito. He started the mess at the meeting and he should pay. I hear the insurance company is not representing them in this because they did not settle when it was reasonable to do so.
I'd love it if someone would go into the monday meeting and ask who is paying this bill.
What do you mean "they need to eat the costs, do what is needed in order for the family to move back in."
?
They never moved out!
I meant eat the costs of getting the home to have occupancy, I didn't know they did not move out. Why isn't the town taking more action and more fines, if this is the case. That's more money that would be due back to the taxpayers. Of course, lets see if they will even pursue collection of these funds.
Mr.or Mrs. Blog Manager,
Why are you tolerating a very sick person from repeatedly spewing his venom on other people using the blog for personal attacks of the
vilest nature.
I refer to the postings of 3/24--3:32 p.m. and the 3/25 postings at 2:38, 5:16, and 8:29. They are
offensive to any civil person.
The purpose of the blog is to discuss valid town issues and not to allow a sick person to use it
as a platform for personal attacks.
Even worse is that hate-filled blogger going after people by mentioning his wife in any context.
I respectfully request that you take your blog
management duties seriously and do not display personal attacks and please remove those already-posted personal attacks.
Abuse of the blog for vicious statements should not be tolerated.
Does that mean that all the other vicious, venomous attacks; and baseless character assassinations; that permeate this blog are OK?
I respectfully request that you take your blog
management duties seriously and do not display personal attacks and please remove those already-posted personal attacks.
Abuse of the blog for vicious statements should not be tolerated.
I guess you haven't been paying attention. That ship has sailed a long time ago.
Didya ever think that the reason nobody moderates this thing is that the town and it's lawyers have spent over $20,000 trying to find out who runs this thing, and nobody want to be in depositions with the town over this?
It's clear who runs it, proving it is not easy. Time will tell shortly!
Really? Who?
THE VACUUM SALESMAN RUN,S IT
ok, glad you cleared that up
HEY WAIT A MINUTE PHIL CONSENTINO WAS A VACUUM CLEANER SALESMAN!
Why did the town grant anyone a building permit on what was obviously not what the property owner thought it was? I doubt anyone would spend hundreds of thousands building a house knowing they didn't have the access claimed and damned the torpedoes.
The ZBA did not do its diligence in granting a variance. Isn't the ZBA's job to ensure representations regarding deeds, legal descriptions, surveys and other important, relevant FACTUAL information are reviewed in detail BEFORE they allow a variance and the town grants a building permit? Did the ZBA make a legal opinion on the access without town counsel opinion?
Did the ZBA just take the Osborns word for it? I don't understand how the variance and building permit were ever issued in the first place. Blame the Osbournes all you want and it sounds like they went too far. Seems they never should;ve gotten a permit to begin with if someone did their homework. But everyone wants to avoid this question and blame the Osbornes. I have no doubt they are in the wrong per the court. But WHO approved their plans? Why weren't they stopped by the inspection process along the way? The town can cry victory now but it looks like the fight should have never begun if the job was done right up front. WELL ZBA?
The ZBA, Osborns, Polito and selectmen were in collusion to steal Mrs. Davis's land. Polito helped Osborn’s before and did it for a third time. That’s the only plausible explanation for it.
No need for zoning regulations when they are not enforced equally. It’s not like Polito wasn’t warned that the Osborn’s didn’t own Davis land, right?
Zoning regulations are nothing more than a license to steal and to punish people who are presumed to be an enemy of those in power.
So much for honorable people running our town.
jmho
Please answer with some intelligence, the variance and the Davis civil suit has nothing to do with one another.
Let's check your knowledge of the events that lead up to Osborn's building permit, ok?
1. What board issued their permit?
Drove by and saw this truck parked sideways up that new driveway, blocked it off.
Does Mrs. Davis have the right to stop the Osborns from using their new driveway?
Was the truck on fire?
If anon March 28, 2011 5:06 PM
had read the article, he would have answered his/her own question. Hope he/she is not registered to vote?
To Mr Know It All
March 28, 2011 4:48 PM
I dont know dis was a kwiz or I'd a dun studdied forr it.
Lemme guess - Phil issues building permits. If not him then must be Frank.
LOL
The answer to your mystical question is on the town website so you can go read it for yourself.
Now go on with your distraction attempt and weak defense of the ZBA's failure to do their homework.
12:13pm what regulations were not enforced, please stop speaking out your a$$. Site what the town did not enforce and the special treatment the Osborn's received? Bet you can't!
Bennett finally moves his cadi, guess he heard I was coming in tonight to park my RV.
You can thank this blog or Bennett would not have moved his car. How about an apology Billy,
Yes, Mrs. Davis has the right to destroy the Osborns driveway if she wishes. The Judge explicitly said that in his Order, it is hers to do with as she wishes.
That's nice Mark, keep the attention away from your friend Bennett. It's so sweet how you two protect each other. Not for long.
What about the building trash Osborns put in Big Island Pond. Got to dregg that all out.
It would be downright friendly for the Osborns to offer all their junk from our lake to plug that driveway hole up but don't know if safe fill.
Anyway heard our Department of enviroment ordered it.
Hope it gets done before summer. Me? Sure don't wanna swim in it that junk.
my opinion
Big Island Pond Lover
Well, did the ZBA do it's job?????????????????????
Looks like perhaps the Osbournes will point back to the town as the source of this debacle. Maybe we all get to pay their fines for them thru increased insurance fees?
What say ZBA?
To Anon March 28, 2011 5:18 PM
So the ZBA issued the Osborn permit to build. I'm surprised you knew that,so who was the Chairman at that time?
Ah yes, demonize me now, well I call them like I see them, always have, and Atkinson has become a town where it is costly to do that.
I was responding to the person who asked if she had a right to block the driveway.
Carry on with your juvenile Caddy behind the Town Hall rants.
He probably took the caddy to China with him. They don't make 'em big enough over there.
They detected radiation over there. We have it here too, but we're not THAT close.
I am a former town official and currently have a valid legal case regarding another town resident. The Board of Selectmen are now authorizing payment for private legal expenses of former town officials. The precedent is set. I qualify and I am due the same right of legal fee compensation as others who served the town. I will consult with my attorney regarding the town picking up the legal expenses. I thank you Bill.
Sounds like Bill's upset with Bill.
The 2010 Town Reports are in Town Hall FOR THE ASKING.
How many people will go to Town Hall to register a car, pay taxes, etc., without knowing that the Town Reports are available only to those who know to ask for a copy?
That's not right. A stack of those Town Reports should be placed on the glass counter near the entrance so that everyone who uses Town Hall can see them and pick up a copy.
It was bad enough that the Selectmen violated NH law by not
providing everyone a copy before
annual town meeting. Now, they're
not readily making them available
to ordinary citizens who can only
get a copy if they ask for one.
ZBA doesn't issue permits. Only variances. But you need the variance to get the permit in the Osborns case. One can't occur without the other. No variance for what they applied for, no building permit.
You can blame it on the Osborns for plowing ahead but can't ignore the town should never have issued the variance.
Had ZBA done its homework and learned the FACTS and checked with Town Counsel, no variance would have been granted (thus no building permit) and the entire Osborn matter would have been avoided.
What say you Mr Know It All?
I agree.
Yes but the ZBA is not obligated to issue variances, either.
When someone is asking for a variance, that involves building a driveway, and their neighbor comes in and says you can't build that across my land, and the person building the driveway says yes I can, Wouldn't it behoove the ZBA to say, tell you what, Maggie, you show us that you own the land, and we will grant your variance?
Does anyone know if there is a deadline for the Osborns to comply with the judge's order for them to obtain occupancy?
Also, Mason's timeframe for tearing down his illegal addition is coming up in April. It's still there.
The short answer is that the ZBA is not a land court. The Davis-Osborn dispute was a civil matter and the ZBA had no place in that dispute.
An applicant came in to the ZBA for a variance making certain representations. The ZBA does not go to the County Clerk to research deeds and the like to validate applicant claims. It rules on the applicant's representations (and if those representations are knowingly false, the applicant is at risk of subsequent enforcement actions.)
The Osborns are the ones who acted improperly... and the courts have shown that time and again.
Justice moves slowly... but it appears the Osborns will ultimately pay the price.
The ZBA TURNED this into a civil matter KNOWING FULL WELL that the Osborn's didn't own the ROW. They allowed them to build a bigger house based on OSBORN lies, at Carol Davis's expense. The TOWN caused the lawsuit through Polito's friendship with Osborn and never informing Mrs. Davis as an abutter.
Remember that Mrs. Osborn was on the zba board at time of aproval.
Anyone see anythig wrong with the process, and how corruption was involved?
Anyone see how the process needs to be changed to protect the innocent, as compared to damageing another taxpayer?
Does anyone believe the selectmen will make the neccesary change, as compared to keeping their power over the innocent taxpayer?
Corruption and POWER is the root of all the problems in this town. We need to do something about it now, or another taxpayer will be hurt in the future. Do you really want that to happen to you? Do you want to be next to suffer the attacks of the likes of Consentino, Sapia, Childs, Polito, Friel, Sullivian?
If not.............do something about the Atkinson Mafia NOW!
The next lawsuit brought against the town might be yours!
God bless Carol Davis for standing up for her rights. It came for a price that you might not be able to afford, while the Town stood by and did nothing but nod their bobble heads.
JMHO
Good for you Carol on your win back of your land taken from you! Make em put back every tree flower rock and plant.
More money for harassment is a good thing. You deserve ALOT. A whole whole whole lot of money.
I can't shed tears when a big town bully gets put down by a judge. Ha. Time to party. Big big party.
These Bullies count on people too scared and weak to fight back. HA. You showed em good Carol. They better not mess with you ever again.
I hope you get more town bullies and lowlifes who helped em steal your land and make them pay BIG TIME. Go get em girl.
Save Atkinson, Honor Dale, BOYCOTT the BLOG
Let me put it to you a different way, though I do not expect you to understand.
The ZBA did not approve or endorse the driveway over Davis land. They merely said that the Fire Department must be satisfied. That could have taken many forms (including sprinkling).
The ZBA had no knowledge that the applicant would do what they did, and the ZBA did not sanction the Osborns to do what they did. The record clearly shows the ZBA would (properly) take no position on the driveway matter when it was proffered.
All you haters will never be swayed, but if some readers are here trying to form an informed opinion, the courts have ruled convincingly that the Osborns are the violators here, the ZBA properly kept out of it.
Nice try putting a spin to protect the town, but alis...........just another lie.
joho
OMG give it a rest Leon.
Judge Lewis told Maggie to give it a rest, and she is still using the same arguements that cost her the judgement against her. It didn't work then and it's not working now.
Just because she continues to lie to everyone, doesn't mean any truth will come out of it. It just proves she will never except any responsibility for her actions. That make her a dangerous woman.
Post a Comment