Atkinson Town Hall

Atkinson Town Hall
The Norman Rockwellian picture of Atkinson

There is a NEW POLL at Right--------------------->

Don't forget to VOTE!
Make your voice heard!

Welcome Message and Mission Statement

Welcome to the NEW Atkinson Reporter! Under new management, with new resolve.

The purpose of this Blog is to pick up where the Atkinson Reporter has left off. "The King is dead, Long live the King!" This Blog is a forum for the discussion of predominantly Atkinson; Officials, People, Ideas, and Events. You may give opinion, fact, or evaluation, but ad hominem personal attacks will not be tolerated, or published. The conversation begun on the Atkinson Reporter MUST be continued!

This Blog will not fall to outside hacks from anyone, especially insecure public officials afraid of their constituents criticism.

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Proposal could affect water supply in 2 towns

From the Eagle-Tribune!

Proposal could affect water supply in 2 towns
By Rebecca Correa
Staff writer

NEWTON — The water supply for more than 150 families in Plaistow and Newton could be affected by a plan to build pump houses in the town's largest aquifer.

The Hampstead Area Water Co. has proposed a 742-acre water franchise, or pump houses, on land that abuts Plaistow. The proposal is meant to serve Sargent Woods, a senior housing project with 80 units, now under construction in Newton.

But Plaistow and Newton officials said the water franchise could affect those who already live in town — and they're hoping residents attend an informational meeting about the topic tonight.

Newton Planning Board member James Doggett said in the worst-case scenario, the proposal could limit the water supply for every house along Smith Corner Road, Peaslee Crossing Road and part of Route 108.

And it won't just be Newton's private wells that are affected.

"There are houses in Plaistow that sit on the aquifer that could potentially be looking at water problems because HAWC petitioned (to withdraw) 30,000 gallons a day," Doggett said.

Plaistow plans to send representatives to the meeting tonight for exactly that reason.

Specifically, the proposal would hurt residents of Sweet Hill Road and Greenfield Drive, according to Leigh Komornick, Plaistow's planning coordinator.

Residents in the Sweet Hill Road neighborhood are already experiencing water pressure problems and drawing more water out of the same aquifer would only make their problems worse, Komornick said.

"From what I understand, they (are) concerned about the adequacy of water now," she said. "I don't know if it's the amount or the pressure, but they are already having problems."

Komornick said a third housing development has been approved on the Newton border, but construction hasn't started yet. Houses there could be affected, too, she said.

"I think there's going to be significant withdrawal going on," Komornick said.

The withdrawal does not require town approval and the state would have given the water company the OK. But Newton selectmen intervened at the request of the Planning Board.

Doggett said the intervention allows for the public meeting tonight. At the very least, he said, it will give residents a chance to be informed and stall the installation of more than a dozen pump houses.

"What selectmen can do to try to affect the (state) Public Utilities Commission decision is limited," he said. "But if 600 people showed up to the meeting tonight and said they don't want this, the Public Utilities Commission, one assumes would actually listen to this."

The Hampstead Area Water Co. is based in Atkinson and has been in business for about 30 years. It is the third-largest private water provider in the state and serves at least 10 communities.

A phone call to the general manager of the company was not returned.

Doggett said he doesn't like the lack of local control that comes with the proposal. If the pump houses are put in, he said, the opportunities for the company are endless. For starters, if the town ever wanted municipal water, the Hampstead Area Water Co. would have the rights or could require the town buy them out.

"They can actually petition the rights to bottle water right here in town, too," he said. "The franchise is sort of like telling residents you can only shop at that car dealership or shop on a store on your street. Individual homeowners have certain rights and no company should be able to petition the state and take away your right to make a decision."

Doggett said Planning Board members are also unhappy the company didn't compromise with them and build a smaller franchise.

"It seems way in excess of what they need," he said. "They also offered to reduce the size of their franchise request and they rescinded that offer just two weeks later."

But most residents in both towns don't know enough about the proposal to make up their minds one way or another.

Newton town office manager Mary Winglass said the meeting is a prime time for people, herself included, to find out exactly what the positive and negative impacts of the proposal would be.

"What we're trying to do at this meeting is, first of all, get answers to questions about it," she said. "We want to find out what kind of rights does it give the homeowners. Will water taken be off the property and can we manage this?"

Doggett said he's sure most people in town don't know about the water franchise, but everyone should become informed and attend the meeting tonight to voice their opinions. The Public Utilities Commission will also hold an informational meeting at a later date this summer.

"Nine out of 10 people who have no idea what's going on will assume the Planning Board blessed this, and we don't," he said. "We've struggled hard and long to make sure the town is well served and when the townspeople don't pay attention, there's only so much we can do."

Staff writer Meghan Carey contributed to this report.

Water Worries

Who: Residents of Newton and Plaistow

What: Informational meeting about proposed water franchise

When: Today at 7 p.m.

Where: Sanborn Middle School gymnasium, 31A West Main St.

Why: Discuss a water franchise scheduled to be built on the Newton/Plaistow line

WOW!! Did you read THAT???

THE NEWTON SELECTMEN INTERVENED IN THE PROCESS ON BEHALF OF THE TOWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE PLANNING BOARD!

This is what the citizens of Atkinson asked our esteemed leaders, Selectman Sapia, Childs, and Sullivan to do on our behalf, and they told us;

Sorry, it's the States problem, not ours!

GUYS, It is YOUR problem to do what the voters ask you to do, NO MATTER WHAT!!!

Our planning board, and selectmen, were only too happy to ignore this potential problem.

And they wonder why they get so much criticism....

9 comments:

Atkinson-Factor said...

From what i have read and understood about aquifers, is that some take hundreds of years to "recharge". I do not agree with Lewis's board of water experts one bit. They can do all the talking they want to, but i wasn't born yesterday. Profit over everything else, that is what i read into it.

webmaster said...

This sage continues. Subsequent to the original story, HAWC revised its plans and reduced its request for the Newton franchise from 742 acres to 66. The story can be found on the water site, www.just-goaway.com .

What is really significant about this story is that the Newton BOS and planning board, along with Plaistow officials got actively involved in the process and lobbied for the people who would have been affected. Compare this with Atkinson where the BOS said there was little they could do and Harold Morse, President of HAWC, sits on planning board.

I want to remind the people of Atkinson that a Special Town Meeting is coming up this month. The purpose of the meeting is to determine if three citizen petitions intended to help safeguard Atkinsons aquifer should be put to a vote. Some may recall the first two petitions were presented at last years Deliberative Session. This is where the Town Moderator stood in front of the residents and told them that any petition can be made meaningless. It is not against the law but that does not make it right.

Well, thanks to the changes made to the petitions, and HAWC's request to draw massive amounts of water from Atkinson's aquifer, the petitions are back.

Anybody on a well in Atkinson, which is the majority of the population, is affected by HAWC's request and should be very, very concerned about it. Since only three petitions will presented at the special session, the cute trick pulled at last years meeting has a much greater chance of not working. However, for this to happen, YOU MUST ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING. It takes physical bodies at the meeting to vote. You cannot phone this one in. Sure its summer and you'd rather be doing other things. But, you have to ask yourself, what is more important, the other things, or having water available when you turn on the tap.

Watch the water site, www.just-goaway.com ,for details as they become available.

Anonymous said...

The selectmen are for giving our water away. Time to stop them from doing that. Everyone needs to show up for this Special Town Meeting, to protect your rights. Time to show our selectmen, they can not deny the will of the people.

Anonymous said...

Why aren't people paying attention? Howard Morse on the Planning Board"? Howard Morse is a conflict of Interest. Howard Morse is the "Interest" and needs to GO. Down with anyone that allowed it.

Where is out "Conflict of Interest" board? Oh, we don't have one. So much for our "special interest" committee.

Anonymous said...

Harold Morse on the Planing Board is equivalent to the fox watching the hen house. It is wrong and he should resign.

Another troubling thing is Mr. Morse's penchant for silence. Read the newspaper articles. He's always unavailable for comment. At the water presentation several months ago where HAWC's plans were presented, he basically did a "No Comment" to questions. Is he afraid his words will be used against him? Is he hiding something?

For the president of a company with plans to will affect a great number of people, silence is not what we want to hear.

Anonymous said...

"Why aren't people paying attention?"

Because we're dealing with human nature. Some people realize that HAWC's request poses a significant risk to area wells and they are trying to do something about it before the fact.

Reality however is that the majority don't care. They think it won't affect them. I know people within 2000 ft. of Midpoint and there is not a concern in their head. True to human nature, it is going to take a relative disaster to get them involved. Their water suddenly starts getting gritter, pressure becomes intermittent while showering, water stop all together. THEN, you have their attention, but it is too late. Sad, but we've all seen this behavior many, many times.

Just makes you want to go up to them and slap them alongside their heads and make them realize, IT IS THEIR PROBLEM TOO. Simply showing up at the Special Session would be enough.

Anonymous said...

its not that they want to give our water away, it is that it is too much trouble to stand up and defend it!

You heard Sapia say, "it is the States job". And when the state doesn't do its job, oh well.

Anonymous said...

As usual, Mr. Sapia got it wrong. Sure, the state has final responsibility, but as we've just seen in Newton, an active involvement by the BOS and other appointed officials can have an impact.

The NH DES is not an entity onto itself, but a state agency that will take into consideration the concerns of the people. Contrary to what Mr. Sapia thinks, local elected officials carry a lot of weight with DES when they act as agents for their constituency.

What Newton does not have, and Atkinson does, is Lewis Builders and its sister company, the Hampstead Area Water Company. I don't know this for a fact, but I believe these two companies have a disproportionate influence in local affairs. What we do know is that Harold Morse, the late Peter Lewis's son-in-law, is president of the Hampstead Area Water Company, a member of the Atkinson Planning Board, and a member of the Atkinson Conflict of Interest Committee.

Draw your own conclusions but I think the playing field in Atkinson politics is skewed to the disadvantage of Atkinson's residents.

To address 1:01 PM's first point - Yes, it is a lot trouble. But is the job of the BOS to protect the citizens of Atkinson. They signed up for it, campaigned for it, made promises, and got elected. It is their JOB to take the trouble.

What I'd like to know, whose interests they are really concerned with, the citizens or a private company?

webmaster said...

Please accept this as a new article -

DES requires HAWC to provide more information and revise testing plans

The Eagle Tribune reported today that the NH DES, in a letter to HAWC's consultant, needs to provide more information regarding their large groundwater withdrawal request and to revise their testing methods. The article and the actual DES letter are available for viewing at the water site, www.just-goaway.com

The letter is a little tough to read but two points stand out. 1) Discharge from the pump tests must be done downstream from the monitoring stations. Think about it. 2) For Midpoint, Emery & Garrett, the consultant, must provide documentation that HAWC actually has the right to withdraw water from the site.

This second point raises a lot of questions and could have a dramatic effect on HAWC's plans.

Finally, the location for the Special Meeting will be at the Performing Arts Center at Timberlane High School.