Atkinson Town Hall

Atkinson Town Hall
The Norman Rockwellian picture of Atkinson

There is a NEW POLL at Right--------------------->

Don't forget to VOTE!
Make your voice heard!

Welcome Message and Mission Statement

Welcome to the NEW Atkinson Reporter! Under new management, with new resolve.

The purpose of this Blog is to pick up where the Atkinson Reporter has left off. "The King is dead, Long live the King!" This Blog is a forum for the discussion of predominantly Atkinson; Officials, People, Ideas, and Events. You may give opinion, fact, or evaluation, but ad hominem personal attacks will not be tolerated, or published. The conversation begun on the Atkinson Reporter MUST be continued!

This Blog will not fall to outside hacks from anyone, especially insecure public officials afraid of their constituents criticism.

Monday, May 20, 2013

Hard on the Chief

NHINSIDER

http://www.nhinsider.com/ed-naile/

THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2013 AT 05:40PM
The Town of Atkinson just can’t seem to let an old thug go into retirement. I am of course referring to the now former Police Chief Phil Consentino who ran an intimidation and political favor machine scam for decades.
It must be four years now since taxpayers came to CNHT for help with this guy.
We have had all kinds of lawsuits, controversies, meetings, letters and press in these four years and just when all is about to calm down, the selectmen fired Consentino back in March, here we go again.
The Atkinson Selectmen hired MRI, a municipal handyman group for lazy selectmen, and asked for a review of the police department. That is what everyone thought.
So when taxpayers wanted to see the completed MRI report the issue was handed to a law firm other than the town counsel of record.
They are paying a separate firm to deal with the MRI report?
What, the town counsel is chopped liver? Or is this the same old trick of hiring a separate firm so as to have “damages’ in case of a citizen action in court? They tried that on our CNHT activists.
Suddenly the MRI report is a non-public document because of personnel issues.
Could it be that the old saying, “once a thug always a thug,” has come to its logical end and there is a sexual harassment case against Atkinson?
That is what we hear, which means the chief could beat up on political opponents all he wanted and he had complete cowardly support from the Atkinson Selectmen, but a supposed sexual advance to some poor cutie at dispatch was a bridge too far?
News for the oppressed female!
The MRI report will be handed over to the NH AG’s white wash bucket where it will be determined that there “is not enough evidence to bring a case forward.”
Better get your own lawyer Ms. Municipal Employee.
Oh, and a much better idea than at last years Town Meeting in Atkinson where the selectmen wanted to start a capital reserve fund for legal fees, stop letting the chief get you in trouble.
Is it that hard to let go?
And I would like to see that MRI report, wouldn’t you?

177 comments:

Anonymous said...

I would like to see the MRI report and we paid for this. There is something inherently wrong with the RTK law if we are paying the tab and are left in the dark all the time. There has to be some accountiblity when dealing with public employees. Do we need a warrant article that prevents the BOS from making deals that result in non-disclosure? If they did not pay off the victim, there would be a trial, in public.

Anonymous said...

You pay for police investigations, but those aren't available via the RTK. On going lawsuits aren't either. So you think you can pass a warrant to override state law? Now you're claiming that there was a payoff. Do you have proof or did you pull that out of your posterior?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

the report should be made public and the ex chief should be in brentwood for what he did

Anonymous said...

There WAS a payoff, whether is was monetary or otherwise. And, no one is suggesting that we override State law. What is your problem? All I suggested was that we try a warrant article to prevent the BOS from avoiding lawsuits with deals that are not done in public. Put that in your posterior.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

There WAS a payoff, whether is was monetary or otherwise.

Show proof then.

All I suggested was that we try a warrant article to prevent the BOS from avoiding lawsuits with deals that are not done in public.

If the State laws allow it, you CAN NOT pass a valid warrant that prevents it. It will be deemed illegal.

Anonymous said...

So then what to you suggest to get these so-called representatives to stop paying our tax dollars to hide information from us? In every other Town around residents can get information about why public servants are fired except for in Atkinson. Do civil rights stop at the border like Halloween does?

BTW, I don't have to show proof, in your little imagination, recall that he is gone. That is payoff enough for me and it looks like it was for others too.

Anonymous said...

Did we get to hear that Wade Parsons left his gun unlocked ? Yes. Did we get to hear who lost a gun in a snow bank? No. Yet we had to put up with someone unqualified using a badge to bully people and WE HAD TO PAY HIM A SALARY TOO!!!

Anonymous said...

In every other Town around residents can get information about why public servants are fired except for in Atkinson. Do civil rights stop at the border like Halloween does?

LOL!!! You're a hoot. So this is a civil rights issue??? Quick, call the ACLU!!!

BTW, I don't have to show proof, in your little imagination, recall that he is gone. That is payoff enough for me and it looks like it was for others too.

So he's gone and supposedly you're happy, but yet you're still griping. Interesting...

Anonymous said...

That's your answer? Sure, I'm a hoot, so what? The sad part is that I am correct...Other Towns and Cities do not protect their servants from prosecution or keep their secrets from the public.

There is something wrong with the way we are defining RTK in this State.

Anonymous said...

Other Towns and Cities do not protect their servants from prosecution

What makes you think Atkinson did? It seems to me that the BoS would be in hot water if it failed to report a crime. Now let's try to think logically for a second. The BoS FIRED Phil, why would they in turn protect him? Seems pretty inconsistent don't you think?

or keep their secrets from the public.

So you've done a survey of all the other towns? They NEVER seal minutes or other materials? So how is life in fantasyland??? Perhaps you should take off your conspiracy hat and appreciate the fact that Phil is no longer employed by the town. That is after all what the majority on this blog railed about was it not? It finally happens and you still complain. Good grief...

Anonymous said...

Historically, the BOS has protected him, allowed electioneering, nepotism, bullying of residents and more. This BOS did something more, but it's really not enough. He is going around talking about running for Selectman. If that happened, things would undoubtedly be worse than ever before.

I don't need to survey ALL the other Towns. Take your extremeist comments and talk logically. Methuen, Lawrence, NYC, Haverhill etc. all report to the media when their servants mess up. Never in Atkinson, never do they admit what is going on. No conspiracy hat, just open eyes.

I do not want this man back in power in my hometown.

Anonymous said...

He is going around talking about running for Selectman. If that happened, things would undoubtedly be worse than ever before

That we can agree upon.

Take your extremeist comments and talk logically.

So wanting proof to back up your blanket statements is extremist? Yeah, okay. I'll just take your word because you post on the blog. I'm sure that would be very logical.

Anonymous said...

To ask a person if the polled EVERY other Town and ask if they sealed ALL minutes if just you looking for a fight and a reason to criticize others. Do you think I have to poll every town? Do you think they seal all minutes? All you did was attack but provided nothing concrete and nothing of interest.

Anonymous said...

All you did was attack but provided nothing concrete and nothing of interest.

And all you did was provide off the cuff statements like payoffs and BoS protection without a shred of evidence. Phil is gone. Instead of attacking the BoS for firing him, how about making sure he stays gone? Now that would be productive.

Anonymous said...

if con man runs for selectman there would be a major lawsuit and the truth would come out of what he did

Anonymous said...

You expect us to pick up the slack for the BOS by trying to prevent him from coming back? Why didn't they take care of the problem once and for all? It was their job you know...

Anonymous said...

How is the BoS supposed to stop his campaign? If you don't want him in office, then campaign against him. It's not rocket science. The BoS fired Phil. It's not their job to tell you who to vote for. If they did, you'd be screaming electioneering.

Anonymous said...

Conman committed a crime(s)! Of course the BOS had to fire him to protect them selves. Notice that they are still covering up his perversion so we can’t find out what crime(s). he committed.

Anonymous said...

Wow. Your act is tiring. If the BoS failed to report a crime and it came out, they would be in hot water. Stop being such a simpleton and remove the tinfoil hat you're wearing. If the BoS was protecting Phil, they would never have fired him.

Anonymous said...

I understand that the BOS did a good thing by firing him. We still have a loop hole and he can jump thru it into a Selctman's seat if our ever-so-gullible vote him in again. The loop hole is there because there are no pending criminal charges.

What if he runs, what if he wins, what if he retaliates against those who he perceives as his newest enemies?

Being in charge of the Twon, they should have done more to assure his departure from public service for good.

BTW, there's more than one person blogging in opposition to you. These comments are not all mine.

Anonymous said...

If there are no pending criminal charges, then maybe it's because there was no crime. It's inconsistent to think that the BoS would fire the guy only to turn around and "protect" him. It makes no sense.

Anonymous said...

Sure, that part makes no sense. We are not saying they are protecting him willfully. We are saying they dropped the ball when they didn't find a way to make sure he'd never be back.

I'm sure there was a crime, ironic isn't it? he has spent years looking the other way when crimes have been committed in Tow, now he gets off.


Anonymous said...

Of course there are no pending criminal charges, because the BOS won't release the MRI report. They fired him with cause to protect themselves from criminal charges. By not releasing the report keeps him from being prosecuted.

It appears that the Conman is a sexual pervert. Does that mean the Conman was looking into windows while ladies are naked? Does it cover abusing little boys or girls? Could it mean he was exposing himself in a public or police station bathroom? Could it be that our police chief was assaulting a fellow female officer? Could it be that he was canceling out speeding tickets if the female speeder took care of his sexual needs in a secluded area?

All these questions could be answered if selectmen released the MRI report. There is a reason they won’t release it. Doesn’t take much imagination to know why they won’t release it. This is a cover up and it isn’t the first time they have covered for this pervert! Heaven help the selectmen if they are covering for a criminal. The firing and cover up is Atkinson’s Benghazi. Now it’s time to see if how many actually died.

Anonymous said...

That's where we differ. I'm not convinced there was a crime. There was an investigation which means people were interviewed. If there was a crime, then several people would know. The BoS would be putting themselves and the town at considerable risk in not reporting it, especially with the number of people who would know. It doesn't fit.

Anonymous said...

Into hyperbole much 6:59? So if it was sexual harassment, then releasing the MRI report would harm the victim. I'm sure you don't care about that though. You just want your pound of flesh.

Anonymous said...

If Conman is not fit to be a police chief, fired for cause, we don't want the pervert in any other town position. Who is he going to attack next? Your children, Mother, town clerk, the victim (again), underage girls or boys? He is sick, perverted and we should teach our kids to turn and run if they see him coming toward them. This kind of sickness can't be cured. Town was right to fire him. We must make sure he never holds another official office. He needs to be kept away from good decent people before some else gets hurt.

Anonymous said...

Last I knew sexual attack is a crime. How come our police chief isn't being held accountable? If it were you or I, we would have a court date by now. Sexual assault is no joke. Ask anyone that has experienced it! The BOS is protecting a criminal by not releasing the MRI report. The people have a right to know and be protected. It's a public safety issue. The selectmen owe it to us.

Anonymous said...

Sexual harassment and sexual assault are two very different animals. I'm sure if it was a sexual assault charges would have been pressed.

Anonymous said...

If you think sexual harassment would get Consentino fired with cause, I have a bridge for you to buy too. Sexual assault would get him fired. If the selectmen promised to fire him in exchange for her dropping the lawsuit OR paid her off with taxpayer money, they would need to keep the report from the public. That spells cover up! The public needs to be protected from this pervert. The selectmen need to release the report.

Anonymous said...

If you think sexual harassment would get Consentino fired with cause, I have a bridge for you to buy too. Sexual assault would get him fired. If the selectmen promised to fire him in exchange for her dropping the lawsuit OR paid her off with taxpayer money, they would need to keep the report from the public. That spells cover up! The public needs to be protected from this pervert. The selectmen need to release the report.

Anonymous said...

Sexual harassment is a fireable offense in pretty much every place I've worked. It depends upon the level. I don't see why the BoS wouldn't fire for cause if the sexual harassment was severe. If there was an assault, it's likely the victim would press charges. Again, why would the BoS cover for Phil after they FIRED him??? It makes no sense. If they were covering for him, they would have thrown him a retirement party and none of this would have come out.

Anonymous said...

Sexual harassment committed by Atkinson's top law enforcement officer at ANY level is unacceptable. (He new better and did it anyway) Of all the reasons selectmen should have fired him in the past and didn’t, harassment would not have been one of them. If selectmen didn’t fire him for sexual assault they could be held personally responsible.

If selectmen paid off the person that was assaulted, she (he) would not press charges. A payoff would be a reason for a cover up and selectmen could cover their tracks. Town’s people must be told what illegal thing their police chief committed so they can make the decision as to allow their children to be left alone with him. It’s a public safety issue and the selectmen are refusing to release the MRI report. I\t doesn’t take a genius to figure out why.

Looks like you want to buy the bridge. When will you have cash to pay for it and where would you like the deed delivered?

Anonymous said...

Previous boards had different members. You do understand that different people on the board bring a different point of view I hope?

If there was a sexual assault, the payoff would most likely need to be substantial. Do a RTK and go through the books and see if any female has received a sizable check in the range of 5 to 6 figures. If there was a sexual assault and the selectmen didn't report it, they would be putting themselves and the town at great risk. Buying the bridge? No. It's called critical thinking. Try it sometime.

As soon as MRI was brought in to investigate, this would insure that multiple people would know what the issue was. It's like the old saying goes, two people can keep a secret if one is dead. So the selectmen are going to risk liability and prosecution under those conditions??? For what reason? Why would they protect Phil when they fired him??? Sorry, you make no sense.

Anonymous said...

Police Chief Phil Consentino was fired for his despicable, illegal actions. He is guilty of a crime that is not being reported. He held the forth most powerful position within our town. The selectmen hold the other three. They were working together as a team to run our political affairs. There is a conflict of interest to have selectmen investigate themselves in this case. They should have turned this over to the State Police. They didn’t. They sealed the minutes, and are keeping the MRI report sealed forever. Who does this help? The public? I think not. This allows the sexual predator to be running around amongst us, (with selectmen approval) ready to strike again at any moment. It keeps the public from knowing where he might strike again, while bragging he is going to run for a selectman’s position in the next election. Like Bengarzi where many people knew about the illegal actions, are we going to wait till someone gets killed before this man is exposed for what he did?


Critical thinking demands the MRI report be released and minutes of meetings revealed. There is something wrong with your critical thinking process if you are defending the selectmen’s right to hide the facts. Again, it’s a public safety issue. Let’s hope that it’s not your wife that gets raped, or YOUR children violated by this man. That might change your thinking. Then again, maybe not..

Anonymous said...

I'm sure Fred Childs, who hates Phil, just jumped at the opportunity to protect him. You're an idiot.

Anonymous said...

Didn't take you long to get into the name calling, now did it.

Fred Childs was out voted. He's no longer in office. Does that make you an idiot or just a Consentino supporter? I believe the latter. Your position is putting people in danger and you don't care if they get raped or killed. So much for your critical thinking. You are a supporter of the power hungry at any cost. You and people like you are destroying out town, state and country. Why don't you apply for the next position of ambassador to Bengarzi? I hear the position is available. I’m sure Mrs. Clinton will protect you too! Oh, that’s right………..she, like Phil is no longer in office. Apply anyway. I hear the benefits are great with plenty of travel. We need a breath of fresh air.

Anonymous said...

Name calling? Nah. You're an idiot. Let me count the ways. First, the comparison of Atkinson to Benghazi? Idiotic. One deals with foreign affairs, ambassadors, and death. Atkinson? Not so much.

I explicitly stated that Phil getting elected would be a bad thing. Now you have me as a Phil supporter. Idiot.

You come out with accusations of crimes, cover ups, and payoffs, but yet fail to offer either a credible argument as to why the selectmen would engage in such behavior or offer a single piece of evidence. This is nothing more than a fairy tale floating around in your small mind. Idiot.

You say Fred was outvoted, yet Friel had his run ins with Phil. Suddenly he's interested in protecting Phil? Idiot.

Speaking of evidence, let's talk about Fred being outvoted. After a short perusal of the meeting minutes of 2/25, what do I find with unanimous support? Two unanimous votes to seal the emergency non-public meeting minutes of 2/4 and 2/18. Idiot.

Emergency Non-Public Meeting Minutes – 2/4/2013
W. Friel made a motion to accept the Emergency Non-Public Meeting Minutes of 2/4/2013 and sealed as
in accordance with the note included in and regarding such. Second: T. Barbera. 3/0/0.

Non-Public Meeting Minutes – 2/18/2013
W. Friel made a motion to accept the Emergency Non-Public Meeting Minutes of 2/18/2013 and sealed as
in accordance with the note included in and regarding such. Second: T. Barbera. 3/0/0.

Either come back with proof or STFU. Idiot.

Anonymous said...

Children, Fred was on the board in February when the firing for the assault went down. I believe what gentleman #1 meant was that Fred was voted out of office, not out voted against the firing. All voted to fire. Play nice.

Anonymous said...

The vote I pointed to was to seal the minutes which was part of the "cover up". Do try to keep up.

Anonymous said...

Name calling? Nah. You're an idiot. Let me count the ways. First, the comparison of Atkinson to Benghazi? Idiotic. One deals with foreign affairs, ambassadors, and death. Atkinson? Not so much.

NAH, BENGHAZI DEALS WITH ILLEGAL SALES OF WEAPONS TO THE ENEMY BY OUR GOVERNMENT RESULTING WITH PEOPLE BEING KILLED WITH A COVER UP BY THE STATE DEPT. ATKINSON DEALS WITH ILLEGAL ACTIONS BY THEIR POLICE CHIEF WHEN SOMEONE WAS HARRASSED, ASSAULTED, RAPED, OR WORSE. COVER UP WAS INVOLVED BY SEALING OF THE RECORDS. WHO DOES THAT BENEFIT?


I explicitly stated that Phil getting elected would be a bad thing. Now you have me as a Phil supporter. Idiot.

IF YOU WERE TRULY CONCERNED THAT CONSENTINO WOULD GET ELECTED, YOU WOULD BE OUTRAGED BY THE COVER UP. YOU APPEAR NOT TO BE CONCERNED. THE WHOLE TOWN SHOULD BE OUTRAGED

You come out with accusations of crimes, cover ups, and payoffs, but yet fail to offer either a credible argument as to why the selectmen would engage in such behavior or offer a single piece of evidence. This is nothing more than a fairy tale floating around in your small mind. Idiot.

THE EVIDENCE COMES FROM THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT AND RESULTING MRI REPORT. CONSENTINO’S ACTION WAS SO ILLEGAL AND DISGUSTING, IT RESULTED IN HIS IMMEDIATE FIRING. THE REASONS WERE SEALED FROM THE PUBLIC. WHY, IF NOT A COVER UP? THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO KNOW. THAT PERVERT IS STILL RUNNING AROUND TO STRIKE AGAIN.

You say Fred was outvoted, yet Friel had his run ins with Phil. Suddenly he's interested in protecting Phil? Idiot.

YOU STATED: I'm sure Fred Childs, who hates Phil, just jumped at the opportunity to protect him. YET THE MINUTES YOU SUPPLIED PROVES THE VOTES TO SEAL WERE UNANIMOUS INCLUDING FRIEL AND CHILDS. STOP SPEAKING OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF YOUR MOUTH.
.
Speaking of evidence, let's talk about Fred being outvoted. After a short perusal of the meeting minutes of 2/25, what do I find with unanimous support? Two unanimous votes to seal the emergency non-public meeting minutes of 2/4 and 2/18. Idiot.

I NEW THAT BUT BETTER IT CAME FROM YOUR RESEARCH. YOU WOULD HAVE DENIED IT IF I HAD SAID IT. THANKS FOR FALLING FOR THE TRAP.

Emergency Non-Public Meeting Minutes – 2/4/2013
W. Friel made a motion to accept the Emergency Non-Public Meeting Minutes of 2/4/2013 and sealed as
in accordance with the note included in and regarding such. Second: T. Barbera. 3/0/0.

Non-Public Meeting Minutes – 2/18/2013
W. Friel made a motion to accept the Emergency Non-Public Meeting Minutes of 2/18/2013 and sealed as
in accordance with the note included in and regarding such. Second: T. Barbera. 3/0/0.

Either come back with proof or STFU. Idiot.

NO NEED TO CALL YOU NAMES, YOU ARE JUST ONE OF THOSE UNDER INFORMED VOTERS OUR COUNTRY HAS TO SUFFER A PRODUCT OF OUR UNDER PERFORMING PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEMS. A PERSON THAT IS SO DEPENDENT ON GOVERNMENT TO SURVIVE, THAT HE BELIEVES EVERYTHING GOVERNMENT SAYS AND DOES. BETTER TO BE PITTIED.

Anonymous said...

Show proof or STFU. No proof, just blather from an idiot.

Anonymous said...

BTW, as I pointed out before, you would seal the MRI report to protect the victim in a sexual harassment case. Idiot.

Now please enlighten us all why the selectmen, one of which hates Phil and another who had run ins with Phil, would put themselves at risk by not reporting a crime? What is in it for them? Nothing. What's the downside? Prosecution. Idiot.

Uninformed? Hardly. I refuse to believe that everyone associated with town government is part of some sort of grand conspiracy. I know many of them and there are some very good decent people, including on the BoS.

Anonymous said...

Show proof or STFU. No proof, just blather from an idiot.
May 24, 2013 at 4:49 PM

WORK TO OPEN THE SEALED MRI REPORT AND THE PROOF WILL BE RIGHT THERE IN FRONT OF YOU. COVER UP IS SELECTMEN WON’T GIVE IT TO YOU. WHO BENEFITS FROM THAT?

BTW we won't shut up till the truth comes out. How about you?

Anonymous said...

Oh, so you must be like the great Kreskin. You KNOW what's in the report even though you haven't seen it. Idiot.

You still didn't provide a good answer as to why the selectmen would put themselves at risk by covering up a crime. Oh, I know why. There is none. Idiot.

Who benefits from the report being sealed? The victim! Idiot.

Anonymous said...

Evidently this person #2 is a Selectman.

Anonymous said...

BTW, as I pointed out before, you would seal the MRI report to protect the victim in a sexual harassment case. Idiot.

OR THEY WOULD SEAL THE REPORT IF THEY CUT A DEAL WITH THE VICTIM TO KEEP HIS OR HER MOUTH SHUT. ESPECIALLY, IF THEY GAVE HER MONEY FOR HER PROMISE NOT TO SUE THEM.

Now please enlighten us all why the selectmen, one of which hates Phil and another who had run ins with Phil, would put themselves at risk by not reporting a crime? What is in it for them? Nothing. What's the downside? Prosecution. Idiot.

HOW WOULD YOU KNOW WHO HATES WHO UNLESS YOU ARE ON THE INSIDE? ANSWER: THEY GET TO KEEP THEIR POWER IF NO ONE SUES THEM. EVER HEARD OF POWER BROKERING? WOULDN’T BE THE FIRST TIME IT WORKED.

Uninformed? Hardly. I refuse to believe that everyone associated with town government is part of some sort of grand conspiracy. I know many of them and there are some very good decent people, including on the BoS.

OF COURSE YOU KNOW THEM. YOU WERE ONE OF THEM.

WE KNOW CONSENTINO IS A SEXUAL PERVERT.

IF CONSENTINO WAS ENGAGING IN BEASTIALITY AND HAVING SEX WITH HIS GERMAN SHEPARD AND YOUR POMERANIAN IN FRONT OF HIS OFFICERS AT THE POLICE STATION, AND YOUR POM GAVE BIRTH TO A BAULD HEADED WOLF COVERED IN WOOL AND A ATKINSON CHIEF OF POLICE BADGE HANGING AROUND ITS NECK, YOU WOULD DENY BEING THE PROUD OWNER OF A CONSENTINO PUP. YOU ARE NOT AN UNINFORMED VOTER, YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE GROUP THAT IS PROTECTING THE CORRUPTION IN THIS TOWN.

JMHO

Anonymous said...

A selectman? You couldn't pay me enough to deal with the idiots.

If they gave her money... SHOW ME THE PROOF. If I was her I would expect a very large sum to keep quiet.

How do I know Fred hates Phil? Do you ever watch the meetings? It's pretty clear they have a mutual disdain for each other. Idiot.

Yes, all the selectmen and town officials secretly wish to be sexual deviants. I'm sure that must be the case. Idiot.

Anonymous said...

we need to have the state police and the ag look into this

Anonymous said...

yes phil did expose him self and then said i am sorry and he could not get it up

Anonymous said...

No way ..... Haha.. Jody, what ya doing girl, staying with the old creep-o goofball, failure dude?

Anonymous said...

AS I SAID BEFORE, YOU ARE A PRODUCT OF THE CORRUPTION IN THIS TOWN. YOU CONSIDER ANYONE BUT YOURSELF AN IDIOT. YOU BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU SEE, HEAR AND WHAT GOVERNMENT TELLS YOU TO SAY. YOU ARE NOT CAPABLE OF SEEING THE TRUTH IF IT HIT YOU IN THE HEAD. YOU ARE WHAT IS WRONG IN ATKINSON.

BENGHAZI POSITION IS STILL OPEN, PAYS WELL, WILL ALLOW YOU TO TAKE YOUR NEW PUPPY AND CONSENTINO AS YOUR PARTNER WITH BENEFITS. I KNOW THERE A FEW GUYS OVER THERE THAT WANT TO MEET YOU. WE WILL WELCOME THE FRESH AIR AFTER YOUR GONE.

Anonymous said...

No, I'm a product of my parents. I don't consider everyone an idiot. Just you. BENGHAZI!! COVER UPS!! CORRUPTION!! OMG SEND IN THE NATIONAL GUARD!! WE'RE BEING SMOTHERED!!! LOL. You are such a tool. Thanks for laugh. Idiot.

Anonymous said...

the old creep needs to be put away

Anonymous said...

when are we going to have a bos meeting does it have to be closed captioned new that friel lost his hearing

Anonymous said...

Anonymous
May 24, 2013 at 6:58 PM

No, I'm a product of my parents. I don't consider everyone an idiot. Just you. BENGHAZI!! COVER UPS!! CORRUPTION!! OMG SEND IN THE NATIONAL GUARD!! WE'RE BEING SMOTHERED!!! LOL. You are such a tool. Thanks for laugh. Idiot.

YOUR ANSWER IS YOUR EQUALIVANT TO HILARY CLINTON'S RESPONSE "WHAT DOES IT MATTER"! SHE DIDN'T CARE ABOUT MURDER, AND YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT CONSENTION'S CRIMES. THAT MAKES YOU AND HER A DANGER TO THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THE USA. YOU SIR ARE A DANGER TO OUR RIGHTS. YOU SIR ARE A SOCIALISTS.

Anonymous said...

I'm a SOCIALISTS? I didn't know I could be more than one. I must be really good at cloning. Idiot. Do you even know what a socialist is? Probably not based upon your use of the word. Idiot.

Anonymous said...

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about socialism as an economic system and political philosophy. For socialism as a stage of economic development in Marxist theory, see Socialism (Marxism).

Part of a series on
Socialism

Development[show]
Ideas[show]
Models[show]
Variants[show]
People[show]
Organizations[show]
Socialism portal
Economics portal
Politics portal
v t e
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy.[1] "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, or citizen ownership of equity.[2] There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them.[3] They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.[4]
A socialist economic system would consist of a system of production and distribution organized to directly satisfy economic demands and human needs, so that goods and services would be produced directly for use instead of for private profit[5] driven by the accumulation of capital. Accounting would be based on physical quantities, a common physical magnitude, or a direct measure of labour-time in place of financial calculation.[6][7] Distribution would be based on the principle to each according to his contribution.
As a political movement, socialism includes a diverse array of political philosophies, ranging from reformism to revolutionary socialism. Proponents of state socialism advocate the nationalisation of the means of production, distribution and exchange as a strategy for implementing socialism. In contrast, libertarian socialism proposes the traditional view of direct worker's control of the means of production and opposes the use of state power to achieve such an arrangement, opposing both parliamentary politics and state ownership.[citation needed] Democratic socialism seeks to establish socialism through democratic processes and propagate its ideals within the context of a democratic political system.
Modern socialism originated from an 18th-century intellectual and working class political movement that criticised the effects of industrialisation and private property on society. In the early 19th-century, "socialism" referred to any concern for the social problems of capitalism irrespective of the solutions to those problems. However, by the late 19th-century, "socialism" had come to signify opposition to capitalism and advocacy for an alternative system based on some form of social ownership.[8] Marxists expanded further on this, attributing scientific assessment and democratic planning as critical elements of socialism.[9]

YOU SIR APPROVE OF SOCIALISM ALONG WITH CONSINTINO'S SEXUAL PERVERSION. YOU SIR ARE DESPICABLE.

Anonymous said...

Cracks seem to be appearing in that Rockwellian image of Atkinson on the intro page. Anger is escaping all over. Atkinson bloggers seem awfully bitter. This is what happens with cover-ups. Justice isn't served and the folks are not fooled.

jmho

Anonymous said...

Consentino was fired for his perversion. You know it wasn't the first time he did what he did. He should be fully investigated as to how many more people he terrorized. Justice demands this cover up ends now

Anonymous said...

This is going to be a long a colorful summer. Lets the games begin! Muahahahaha muahahaha

Anonymous said...

We'll see how good the new chief is now

Anonymous said...

You've been complaining about fireworks on Medication Lane for years. Just sue the Town for failure to respond. Sue the owner for everything you can think of.

Anonymous said...

Consentino is the one we should be suing! A cop gone bad is not unheard of, but a police chief who can't keep his hands of little boys, girls, women and uses his position to satisfy his perversion doesn't deserve to be walking our streets! The man needs to be behind bars!

Anonymous said...

I want to see Atkinson's answer to J Edgar Hoover, driving one of those elderly cars wearing nothing but lady's lingerie. A photo of it would make an excellent jigsaw puzzle for the enjoyment of his main supporters, the Atkinson elderly community. How do you say, make 'em eat their dog food.

Anonymous said...

How do we know it wasn't one of his elderly women that he sexually assaulted? Why put them in danger again? Consentino shouldn't be allowed around any decent person till this is all cleared up instead of covered up.

news said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...


Part time Police Chief Phil V. Consentino has long threatened and actually sued people to protect “HIS GOOD NAME”, when taxpayers complained about his illegal actions. When he actually sued, he dropped the case a few days before a judge was scheduled to hear the case. Months later, he got his private legal fees paid for by a vote of the board of selectmen at taxpayer expense. Why is it that Mr. SEXUAL PREDATOR PHIL V. CONSENTINO” has not filed with the court to ”PROTECT HIS GOOD NAME” now that he has been fired for his SEXUAL PERVERSION? Why now are his friends at the Board of Selectmen refusing to release the MRI report that would prove his SEXUAL PERVERSION? Anyone see a double standard here? Everyone understand why he is bragging he will run and win a selectman’s seat next year?

Does everyone understand there is a CONFLICT OF INTEREST with SELECTMEN INVESTIGATING AND SEALING THE MRI REPORT THAT GOT HIM FIRED? EVERYONE UNDERSTAND THE CORRUPTION THAT IS INVOLVED? Does Mr. Consentino’s Weiner (Anthony Weiner) come to mind? The only thing that matters to MR. SEXUAL PERVERSION CONSENTINO IS THE SIZE OF HIS WEINER AND WHERE HE CAN STICK IT AGAIN. The only thing that matters to OUR SELECTMEN, IS THAT HE CAN STICK IT TO US AGAIN.

WE NEED TO TELL THIS BOARD OF SELECTMEN AND THEIR TA…….WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE AND WE ARE MUST STICK IT TO THEM!

GOD BLESS AMERICA AND THE END OF CORRUPTION IN ATKINSON.

GOOD RIDDENS TO PERVERTS!

Anonymous said...

GOOD RIDDENS TO PERVERTS THAT SUPPORT PERVERTS AT OUR EXPENSE!

TIME TO VOTE IN MORAL PEOPLE TO POSITIONS OF RESPONSIBILITY. THOSE PEOPLE ARE NOT:

BILL FRIEL, FRED CHILDS, BILL BALDWIN, PHIL (PERVERT CONMAN) CONSENTINO & WIFE))OR ANY THAT CAME BEFORE THEM.

TIME TO GET RID OF THE CORRUPTION AND TAKE OUR TOWN BACK.

joho

Anonymous said...

"now that he has been fired for his SEXUAL PERVERSION? Why now are his friends at the Board of Selectmen"

How does that work? I can see the meeting with Phil and the BOS now. "Phil, you're fired. But don't worry, we're really your friend!" LOL.

Anonymous said...

I don't' see how the bos could have fought for him but that doesn't mean they are against him.

Anonymous said...

Should they be against anyone? Maybe start keeping an "enemies" list? I'm not sure you'd like a board who acted in that fashion.

Anonymous said...

We have board that us against all if us now.

Anonymous said...

We do? How so? Is it the entire board or select members? I'm guessing you are saying that because the MRI report was sealed? Was that illegal? If it wasn't illegal, then I don't see how that can be held up as evidence of a board who is against the residents. If it is illegal, then report it to the AG or get an attorney and sue.

Anonymous said...

Ssssshhhhhhh it's 9 o'clock

Anonymous said...

Is it too much to ask that the MRI report be released with the victim's name redacted, if that's what's required legally? What's the difference? We could plug in any name and it would all be the same. We would know who the former Chief of Police really is. So you "do-nothings" on the BOS, bring in Sumner Kalman for a ruling immediately. Or could it be the BOS and MRI are afraid of being sued by Chiefie. Well, join the crowd.

Anonymous said...

If it was the dispatcher like people are saying, how in the world do you redact the report without giving away who it is? If the BOS is "do nothing", then how did they get to the point of firing Phil? Sounds like something to me. Finally, you should be bringing your complaints to the selectmen. Not sure what venting on the blog is going to accomplish. Even if the selectmen read the blog, you're anonymous so you could be from the next town, state, or a different country.

Anonymous said...

Without releasing anything specific to the public, all this talk of the dispatcher is mere speculation. Do you know what redacting means? Sumner has done it for the BOS before on a previous MRI report. And, just because Consentino was fired as Police Chief doesn't mean he can't return as Selectman. All he has to do is call upon his elderly flock to vote him in. And, you sir are anonymous too. Maybe I'm your next door neighbor. The BOS has only done half the job and they know it.

Anonymous said...

Of course I know what redacting means, but again, if it was the dispatcher the investigation would focus around sexual harassment within the PD. Since there are only 2 females working there and one is Phil's wife, it would be pretty obvious who the victim was. You'd have to redact almost the entire investigation.

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...
"now that he has been fired for his SEXUAL PERVERSION? Why now are his friends at the Board of Selectmen"

How does that work? I can see the meeting with Phil and the BOS now. "Phil, you're fired. But don't worry, we're really your friend!" LOL.
May 27, 2013 at 8:47 AM
The firing went more like this.

Phil, of all the bone headed, illegal things you have done in the past, this one is so vulgar, detestable, disgusting, perverted and illegal, we can’t cover it up for you this time... Sexual assault by a police chief is a crime. If we cover for you, we could all go to jail. That being said, you’re fired.

The good news is we will seal the records so no one can find out what you really did. We’ll protect your good name so you can run for selectman next year. Once in office, you can pick your replacement as Chief of Police, Director of Elderly Affairs, and exact your revenge on any dispatcher you want. You can still use the elderly vote to push any spending article we want, and keep us in power forever. The voters are so stupid; they won’t know what hit them till it’s all over. LOL If taxpayers force the issue, we’ll force them to sue us. We’ve done it before and we can do it again. Now, let’s go have a few drinks at the club and have a good laugh over the plan.

.Good night, Johnboy, night Phil, nite Bill, night Bill, night Todd,…:)

Anonymous said...

Have you thought about a career as a fiction writer???

Anonymous said...

To 7:39 redact everything but his name and the charges. That is good enough for me.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Have you thought about a career as a fiction writer???

May 28, 2013 at 9:56 AM

The fiction writing comes from anyone that believes that "The Bully with a Badge" didn't use his position to FORCE someone to do something they didn't want to do.

FACT: The Conman was fired with cause for sexual perversion.

FACT: It's not the first time the Conman did something that anyone else would have been fired for, and lied about it.

FACT: Not the first time selectmen paid big money for reports they never followed through on and ignored putting the recommendations in place.

FACT: Selectmen refuse Right To Know information and force people to sue them to get the information.

FACT: Not the first time Selectmen have covered for the Conman.

Anyone that doesn't insist on the MRI report being public, is part of the corruption that has taken over this town.

FACT: You support a man that abused his position and selectmen that cover it up.

Anonymous said...

farmer phil looking for a pill try one with a big v on it trade in your cattle for some sheep get a hard tree and get some sleep

Anonymous said...

Being fired as a Police Chief proves he's NOT FIT to serve in any public position again. Why is he Bragging he will be a selectman next year? Does he know something no one else knows?

Anonymous said...

Hey, not that there's anything wrong with being gay, but maybe former Chief Consentino was caught being sexually aggressive toward one of the new male officers from Plaistow. Sexual aggression has no place in the workplace. Maybe it wasn't a dispatcher at all. I hear the former Plaistow officers are hot. Can't wait until they come out with a calendar.

Ha,ha,ha!

Anonymous said...

Knowing Consentino, he would demand being shown naked as Ms. October. Ugh! Hope Jody has a REAL MAN boyfriend to escape to. Then again........

Anonymous said...

It's a shame about the dog. Cruelty to animals should never be tolerated.

Anonymous said...

That's why Conman always takes his dog with him in the car.. People around Kingston State Park have reported howling in the woods late at night.

Anonymous said...

Hey, former Atkinson Police Chief Consentino has some farm animals. Does he have any sheep?

Just curious.

Anonymous said...

He got rid of the sheep after two gave birth. One off spring looked exactly like a Sapia and the other was bald and looked like Atkinson's Police Chief at the time. Jody started asking questions and BANG.....no more sheep on the farm.

TTWAT

Anonymous said...

This whole story line would end if the BOS would simply released the latest MRI report on the former Chief and the transcripts of the executive session where the former Chief was canned. Apparently transparency in government isn't practiced by the current BOS. Wonder if the former Chief poses a threat to the community? Looks like the BOS couldn't care less. If he'll go at a dispatcher then he'd probably go after just about any woman in town. Even cat woman. Should he get away with this?

Due to lack of evidence, this is opinion and pure speculation.

Anonymous said...

They can release a redacted version in the least. Have you asked for that?

Anonymous said...

baah baah black sheep

Anonymous said...

You know, I mean what I think is, you know, I mean, whatever.

Anonymous said...

Why is it that a Police Chief that is sworn to uphold the law can sexually attack a woman and not be charged with a crime? Why does the board of selectmen cover for him by not releasing the MRI report that got the Chief fired? Anyone see a pattern here? It has nothing to do with a personnel issue, more like the Mafia at its best.

Anonymous said...

You're making a big assumption that there was a crime. Besides the little voices in your head, what proof do you have that a crime was committed?

Anonymous said...

Thanks to whoever is lighing the fireworks off. My family appreciates the display.

Anonymous said...

How shallow of you.

Anonymous said...

Dream on. I HATE when my neighbors shoot off fireworks, mow on Sunday mornings, let their bratty kids scream and yell,
or fight with each other drunk at midnight. No one wants to hear other people doing ANYTHING. That's why we live here, to have peace and bear arms.

Anonymous said...

My neighbor beeps his horn when he gets home and chirps his alarm over and over, parks in front of my mailbox and also mows on Sunday morning.

Anonymous said...

Hey 10:25 - he got fired for cause. look it up. A crime was committed other than the cover up.

Anonymous said...

Yes, he was fired for cause. There are lots of reasons one can be fired for cause that don't involve a crime.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Yes, he was fired for cause. There are lots of reasons one can be fired for cause that don't involve a crime.

June 1, 2013 at 11:09 PM

DOES THE RAPE OF AN UNDERAGE PER5ON BY A POLICE CHIEF COUNT AS A REASON TO BE FIRED WITH CAUSE IN YOUR OPINION?

Anonymous said...

Most definitely. If this happened the victim and the advocate must report it and press charges.

The current case victim should reevaluate her silence or chance becoming his victim once more.

Anonymous said...

Of course it would be reason not just to terminate, but to prosecute. Do you happen to have some proof that a) this horrible act occurred and b) the selectmen knew about it? Those are serious accusations and one would hope they wouldn't be thrown around simply because one does not like the person in question. To suggest that this happened and multiple people knew and did nothing without any sort of proof at all is beyond irresponsible. I know it's difficult, but do try to think before you type.

Anonymous said...

Who cares if the bos knew? If it happened, go on, save the town by coming forward.

Anonymous said...

The selectmen know and are covering up. Any reasonable person would insist the MRI report be released, and not stop until it is released.

NO reasonable person would want or allow the slightest chance of a sexual predator to be walking our streets ready to strike again.

No selectmen should be allowed to cover for a police chief that is a sexual pervert.

Releasing the report will give
Consentino his good name back. He could end this whole discussion. Why isn't he releasing it himself. Hmmmmmmmmmm?

We all know he has sued people to protect his good name in the past. Why isn't he suing the selectmen or the person that complained to protect his good name now! Hmmmmmmm

Could it be that he's being silent now because he is guilty of raping someone? Hmmmmmmmmmm?

Could it be that if this can't be hushed up, he would be in a jail cell by now?

Everyone should insist the MRI report be released in the namne of justice. It's a public safety issue. Don't want any more under age boys being raped again.

Anonymous said...

You sir are an ass to be making such statements and could be sued for libel against a whole host of people who you've just implicated in either perpetrating a crime or covering for one. I fail to believe that the former chief was fired for rape without a single charge by ANY of the people involved being filed. This would include the alleged victim who you can't produce, the selectmen, the police department as a whole, MRI, and the attorney representing the town. Yes, I'm sure all would simply turn a blind eye to such behavior and put themselves at risk of prosecution. You are such as ass. It can not be said strongly enough.

Anonymous said...

You're right with your comment on the Conmans being accused of raping someone because he would be in jail by now awaiting trial. You are right about the Conman releasing the story ... but then!... he would be opening a can of worms he wouldn't be able to close, his admission of guilt doing[s]. If it were an intentional touch or a not there are written rules of behavior in the work place by local rules and laws of the state. It could be the person who made the complaint is well satisfied to have enabled the BOS to fire the CONMAN and not soil her name publicly. Then too he/she may be just waiting to bring the available charges against the CONMAN and present and/or former other town officials because of past practices of allowing the way to many suits and the many accusations of destructive character attempts on others in the past by the CONMAN. . Then too he/she may be just waiting to receive an offer of monetary value to keep things the way they are now from the COMAN and anyone else, past or present, that may be involved officially or not. .....may be that is.... just maybe. One thing about time is that is ongoing and in time the people involved will be exposed. By the way if a person using drugs or does some thing else he or she is fired and in most of the cases do go to court for sentencing. Ahh! but then there is another person who will pass judgement on all sinners isn't there!

Anonymous said...

Lawsuit (s)? Selectmen would have to release the MRI report then, right?

Anonymous said...

Becareful writing the word Ass. Consentino might get "All Hot And Bothered", and strike again. He needs anger management and help for sexual perversion. We don't need any more of his victims being paid off.

Anonymous said...

Unless we get to hear the sordid details.

MAcciard said...

To MAy 20, 5:33pm; there was no "police" investigation, nor was there any ongoing lawsuit. He CHOSE not to challenge his firing. Probably because he knew that it would all come out in open Court.

MAcciard said...

Sexual Assault IS a crime

Anonymous said...

I need a visual. Bring back Atkinson Bigfoot and have him demonstrate what that neanderthal, former Police Chief Consentino, did. Some folks in town already know.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone know if Consentino was in Boston's Beacon Hill area last Thursday and Friday? If so, the police want to talk to him.

Wouldn't it be funny if Boston police finally do the job our selectmen should have done?

Anonymous said...

Does Jody know where her husband is and what he's doing right now?

Does she care?

Anonymous said...

he need to be put in jail for what he did

Anonymous said...

Consentino is guilty of a sexual........! You fill in the blank. The selectmen fired him for it with cause. Anyone have proof of anything else other than sexual .......? If so, please provide the proof. Otherwise, does anyone feel safe with him still walking around free with selectmen approval? Anyone have proof this is anything else than a cover up by selectmen?

Ask who is the only one benefiting from the cover up, and don't say the victim. She/he/ the goat, sheep, dog are still being targeted by a bully that used to wear a badge. This creep wants to run for a selectman’s position. Anyone really want a sexual pervert in a position of authority where he can target another one of his perceived political enemy?

How about it Mr. Anonymous...June 2, 2013 at 10:22 PM, where do you stand on this issue? Haven’t seen any lawsuits yet, have you? Do you believe the MRI report would have to come out if a lawsuit was filed? Anyone doubt that the only ASS is the one Mr. Consentino wants to exploit and the ASS Mr. . Anonymous...June 2, 2013 at 10:22 PM is trying to cover? Does anyone doubt that Mr. . Anonymous...June 2, 2013 at 10:22 PM along with his buddy Consentino are the ASS everyone should be kicking?

Anonymous said...

Where will you be June 11th? I know where I will be!! ;)

Bear witness

Anonymous said...

I'll bet some other Consentino supporter will be getting their ASS kicked. I'll bet Mr. Anonymous...June 2, 2013 at 10:22 PM will be getting their ASS kicked shortly after. Wanna bet Mr. Consentino supporter Anonymous...June 2, 2013 at 10:22 PM? Ready for YOUR LAWSUIT?

Anonymous said...

NEXT!

Anonymous said...

The streets of Atkinson are not safe. Keep your wives, daughters, sons and pets indoors. And, lock your farm animals in the barn. The Town's Elderly Transport service was used by former Police Chief Consentino as a cover-up for his many Indescretions. Never trust a self-professed do-gooder like the former chief or his protectors and enablers on the BOS and Bubba's blind flock.

Anonymous said...

And now the selectmen want to tear down and rebuild the community center. In all likely hood the building should be torn down but I wonder if the new one,if it were to be built, would be dedicated to the Conman for his costly adventures while employed as an town official. I also do mean ,and after all, he did take care and charm the elderly with his conning methods to get things he wanted in his self imposed kingdom now in ruins.

Anonymous said...

And shame, shame on the Caggiano and the Police Department for not arresting the former Chief and conducting its own investigation independent of the BOS.

We no longer know where the Police Department ends and the BOS begins.

Anonymous said...

Problems at the Community Center are being used as a diversion by the BOS to make us all forget about Former Police Chief Consentino. Nice try!

Anonymous said...

Yes, that must be it because everything in Atkinson revolves around Phil. It's amazing to see how much peoples hatred of one person can render them entirely incapable of logical thought. Best of luck with your hate and your fantasies.

Anonymous said...

To the member of the elderly flock above. Former Police Chief Consentino is UNAMERICAN. Ha to you.

Anonymous said...

I did not see a vote to have the CC rebuilt. We haven't even had meetings lately, in public that is...

Anonymous said...

There was a meeting last night. Any CC rebuild would have to be approved by the voters. Did you read the ET article?

Anonymous said...

I meant there was a meeting Monday night.

Anonymous said...

There was a meeting? I thought I heard we missed two weeks of meetings. My bad.

Yes, I read the article. I am surprised they are marching forward with the plan even before they go to the voters. On second thought, not too surprised.

Anonymous said...

6/5 @ 7:55 , You are more than right!!! We no longer know where the APD starts and ends . We have to have a separation of the department and the selectmen. The Selectmen appoint officers to the APD and have no right to agree ,suggest, or outwardly tell the department what laws and who is to be prosecuted or "gone after" for past likes and dislikes. In my opinion they have no right to say the above things or to carry them out except for appointing members of the department. It would be best to look into the rights of the towns police department to and in its functions of operation along with the BOS official bodies of rights of governing its town department[s]. If there is or were any influence of telling who,what ,where, and how to enforce the state and local laws by the BOS then they are in violation of laws and rights of our state,town,and countries established rules and regulations .--- 6/5 @9:21, It isn't and can't be just a hate thing as much as it is what we all know as the former chiefs well known misdoings while in office as a BOS member and as chief. As for being "incapable of logical thought" you are the one who appears to be the one incapable of logical thinking. If he was fired and for just cause now and what with his past wrong doings your blind to all of what has gone on up to now.-- One has to remember that oaths sworn are to be upheld in any and all offices held by any person in government and law enforcement.

Anonymous said...

You give me a headache with you writing style. Can't you proof read it out loud before you press publish?

Anonymous said...

How do you go to the voters without a plan?

Anonymous said...

HEY, is this Consentino's SECOND sexual assault of record? Does he have to REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER?

Does the BOS not releasing the MRI report keep him from having to REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER? Would this be reason for the BOS cover up?

Anonymous said...

Second?

Anonymous said...

Normal people do not go driving around town or go back to working for their husband's former employer. Normal people do not sit with the accuser. These are sociopaths. Normal people do wrong and atone, feel guilty, apologize.

Anonymous said...

You develop a plan to build anew when you want to sway the voters. Planning gives your motive away.

Anonymous said...

Bubba's blind flock. ROTFLMFAO. A great sheep joke.

Anonymous said...

Consentino doing his sheep is no joke.

Anonymous said...

To anonymous June 5, 2013 9:21AM

These threads aren't hate speech, they're RIDICULE, my man. You and the rest of the Consentino flock are going to have to dream up some other form of slur. Too bad former Chief Consentino isn't black. Then you could call my comments racist. Hate is vandalizing someone's home and car to drive them out of town over conflicting views of politics, justice and reality.

Baaaaaaaaah

Anonymous said...

6/5 @5:06, I'd give you a pill for your headache but I'm not from Medication Lane. You can't say you didn't get my message meaning because you did respond to it.

Anonymous said...

but I did not finish reading it.

Anonymous said...

Interesting how people are jumping to conclusions. I am not a Phil supporter. He's caused a lot of havoc over the years and I'm glad the BOS fired him. Just because I don't believe a lot of the nonsense being posted does not make me a Phil supporter.

Let's talk about logical thinking, but before that, I never claimed there was hate speech. I said posters hate of Phil has caused them not to think logically. Is it logical to believe that Phil was fired for raping a child and the BOS, MRI, the attorney, and people involved in the investigation would simply "cover it up"? That would make them culpable. What is in it for them? Why would they do such a thing when there's a huge downside? There's no logical answer.

Is it logical to believe that when something else goes on in town that doesn't involve Phil it's nothing more than a smoke screen? The community center was closed because an engineer deemed it not to be safe. Believe it or not, there are other issues besides Phil, who is no longer employed by the town. Again, this isn't logical.

Don't mistake my calling out the nonsense as some sort of tacit support for Phil. Phil was fired. I think that's a reason to celebrate, not come up with hair brained fantasies.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Where will you be June 11th? I know where I will be!! ;)

Bear witness

I know where you will be on June 11th, but YOU don't know where I will be. Looking forward to seeing YOU. :)

Anonymous said...

All I know is that I will be with neither of you on June 11th.

Anonymous said...

False witness? Thou shalt not.

Anonymous said...

Where's Acting Police Chief Caggiano when you really need him? Let's see what we know. Former Police Chief Consentino recommended to the Board of Selectmen that Caggiano be hired. He was hired. Once Chief Consentino was canned the BOS makes Caggiano the acting Chief. His supporters gush over the acting Chief for releasing the Police Logs. Important but just fluff. However, when acting Chief Caggiano fails to investigate former Chief Consentino for the crime that got him fired, we get silence. I've lost all confidence in the APD under Acting Chief Caggiano. He's just a tool of this do-nothing BOS.

Hate and fantasy? Baaaaaaaaah

Anonymous said...

Yes hate and fantasy. You WANT the reason Phil was fired to be criminal because of your hate. Again, logic doesn't hold that all the people involved would cover up a crime because if they did and it came out they'd be facing charges. Where's the motivation? I don't see that there is any. BTW, that "do nothing BOS" was the only board to do something about Phil. To bad your hate doesn't let you see that.

Anonymous said...

Get real! You want to see real hate, then google Hutu and Tutsi. And just for your information, the BOS woke up, did half the job with Former Police Chief Consentino, then fell back into their deep deep sleep. Make the MRI report public and turn over all investigations to the State Police. The APD can't be trusted.

Baaaaaaaaaah

Anonymous said...

Uh huh.

Anonymous said...

You want logic, you first have to open your mind.

Logic

Someone complained she/he was sexually..........! You fill in the blank.

Someone reported that she/he was sexually .......by Atkinson's Chief of Police Phil Consentino.

Rather than investigate the complaint, whomever she/he complained to turned it over to the selectmen. Why, when the state police/AG's office should have been called? Selectmen have a conflict.

Selectmen should have turned the investigation over to the State Police or the AG'S office because of their conflict of interest. They did not.

Selectmen spent taxpayer money on a MRI report that confirmed Atkinson Police Chief Phil Consentino did indeed sexually........... the She/he that complained.

Because of the serious nature of the sexual............, selectmen fired the sexual pervert police chief Phil Consentino.

Because of the serious sexual..........., selectmen should have brought in the State Police, or AG's office to do an independent investigation. They did not.

The sexual pervert Phil Consentino could have sued to protect his good name. HE did not.

The sexual pervert is still walking the streets because an independent investigation was not done.

Mr. Sexual pervert Phil Consentino is no longer employed by the selectmen, thus this is not a personnel issue.

Selectmen have no right to keep the public from knowing what is in the MRI report, that got the sexual pervert Phil Consentino fired.

Sexual pervert Phil Consentino is walking the street a free man, able to strike some poor old lady again.

The poor old lady, under aged boy/ girl, disabled female unable to protect herself, someones wife, your dog, sheep etc could be the next victim of the sexual pervert Phil Consentino. If that should happen, it would be because the selectmen would not allow the public to be warned of the sexual pervert Phil Consentino. (PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUE)

If that report comes out after the fact of Consentino next victim report, the selectmen and the town would be held responsible.

More lawsuits can be avoided, if the selectmen would release the MRI report and have the state police/ag's office investigate.

The only one that benefits from the report not being released, is the sexual pervert Phil Consentino and those that are supporting/covering up for him.

If the sexual pervert Phil Consentino strikes again, the selectmen will be equally responsible for his sexual perversion.

The only logical thing to do is release the MRI report and protect the public at large from the sexual pervert Phil Consentino. Redact the name of his last victim, but let the public know what that sexual pervert did, so they can protect them selves.

Anonymous said...

They are never going to release it.

I heard the person went to the Sheriff and did not want to press charges if he was fired, so they investigated using MRI and found cause, fired him.

If you want to blame someone, blame the victim for not standing up for herself. There, I said it, she did not really stand up for herself. She took the easy way out and may someday have to pay for it, as we might, if he comes back in some form..

Anonymous said...

9:38PM,

Your post has so many flaws I almost don't know where to start. First, the rumor is Phil was fired for sexual harassment. That is not a crime. The state police, AG, or any other law agency has no interest in investing non criminal actions. The town employees ultimately report to the BOS. If a complaint is brought forth, it is their responsibility to investigate. In this case they hired MRI who is an outside party. There is no conflict. It would be like if you worked for ACME Co and filed a complaint of sexual harassment. ACME won't go to the police, they'll investigate and take action as they see fit. You show a total lack of knowledge in how this works. If you think the selectmen are acting illegally by not releasing the MRI report, report it to the AG. Let me know how that goes. The rest of the post is nonsense.

Anonymous said...

The rumor is he was fired for assault. That is a crime. That is why the person went to the Sheriff not the BOS.

Anonymous said...

Then how did it end up in the BOS lap? Duh.

Anonymous said...

I heard that she was content with him losing his job. In order for toe BOS to fire him, there had to be an investigation. It was not done by the Sheriff as no charges were being pressed, that left the BOS to do it, via MRI.

Get it?

Anonymous said...

If there was no crime, he would not have gone along with the firing.

Anonymous said...

If the victim won't press charges for sexual assault, maybe those MANLY officers that came over from Plaistow could act as a team and complain about Former Chief Consentino's hostile work environment. Then the EEOC might investigate the APD, the BOS and the sheriff's office for doing nothing. Then again, our town is so small and the APD such a tiny part of it, the federal government probably couldn't care less.

Baaaaaaaaaaaah

Anonymous said...

Time for a protest demonstration at the Former Chief's house, followed by a protest at BOS members houses? The streets of Atkinson are not safe with Consentino walking free and you can blame the dispatcher.

Anonymous said...

Why don't we all focus on what we can do to keep him out of office for good?

Anonymous said...

Protest demonstration??? LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Anonymous said...

Former Police Chief Consentino still has the flock. They're all over this site along with his enablers at the APD and BOS. Unless the truth comes out, he'll probably get elected Selectman next year. You can't dislodge these people, they've done the former Chief's bidding for years.

Baaaaaaaaah!

Anonymous said...

I see we have a sheep posting.

Anonymous said...

Oh, but we can dislodge them by continuing to vote in new people. Their stranglehold on this Town is over. Step up and get involved.

Anonymous said...

This blog has been concerned about 3 people. Consentino, Sapia, and Polito. The last two have been gone for a while and won't return. Consentino is at least out of a position of power compliments of his firing. He can't use a badge any longer. Now the best thing for people here to do, including the posting sheep, is to support whoever runs against Phil. Talk to your neighbors. Get them to the polls to vote against Phil. Write letters to the editor. Now THAT would be productive. Silliness such as "protests" won't get you anywhere.

Anonymous said...

if the pervert get in as selectman there will be a lawsuit

Anonymous said...

hey phil put some peanut butter on your yoho and let the dog lick it off that may help your problem

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

To the person skeptical about picketing Phil's house. One picture of the event in the Eagle Tribune is worth 1000 of Phil's letters-to-the-editor.

JMHO, Thank You.

muhammed waqar said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

The burden of proof for termination is usually not the same as what is required for criminal prosecution. By sealing records the town is protected as is the alledged victim- yes it also protects Phil, but it's a game of Chicken. If either party decides to call the others bluff the dirty laundry goes public. If Phil says "hey- you fired me unlawfully" and decides to sue all the dirt goes public. The info collected to date may not be enough to substantiate a criminal case but probably met the burden of proof needed for a termination. So yes, in a way the BoS has "protected" Phil, but really with the aim of protecting the town. If they release the report with all the dirty laundry Phil no longer has anything to lose by suing the town for unlawful termination and thus costing the town lots of money and time in court.
Just my thoughts anyway-

Anonymous said...

run him out of town in the senick by way with the crackpot carol grant