Atkinson Town Hall

Atkinson Town Hall
The Norman Rockwellian picture of Atkinson

There is a NEW POLL at Right--------------------->

Don't forget to VOTE!
Make your voice heard!

Welcome Message and Mission Statement

Welcome to the NEW Atkinson Reporter! Under new management, with new resolve.

The purpose of this Blog is to pick up where the Atkinson Reporter has left off. "The King is dead, Long live the King!" This Blog is a forum for the discussion of predominantly Atkinson; Officials, People, Ideas, and Events. You may give opinion, fact, or evaluation, but ad hominem personal attacks will not be tolerated, or published. The conversation begun on the Atkinson Reporter MUST be continued!

This Blog will not fall to outside hacks from anyone, especially insecure public officials afraid of their constituents criticism.

Monday, March 31, 2014

Letter: Anonymous Mailing Defames a good man

The Eagle-Tribune
To the editor:
To the anonymous person who has sent a second and very disgusting letter to the seniors of Atkinson: You have stolen the contact information given to the Police Department in conjunction with senior services. This was not meant for use in your crusade against former Police Chief Consentino. Take our names off your mailing list.
We have known Mr. Cosentino for over 45 years and find him to be of the highest character. He is one of the kindest, most caring persons we have ever know and very professional at all times.
Get a life! Spend your time and postage money helping the poor or the homeless. We would tell you face to face, but you don’t have the courage to give a return address.
Denise and John Murrey
Atkinson


53 comments:

AtkinsonReporter2Monitor said...


Mark Acciard

Denise and John, When Phil tells you that someone has "his" elderly mailing list, he is lying to you,. He was FIRED from his position as director of elderly affairs more than a year ago. He should have no list. And when he tells you that these "cowards" are hiding and will not confront him face to face, that also is a lie. I am out in the public domain, and am saying plainly pretty much the same as those letters, flyers, etc. and he is not responding to, or challenging me.

Makes you wonder at the difference between his private statements and public lack of action, doesn't it?

AtkinsonReporter2Monitor said...

Mark Acciard

ROFL, Denise and John, for it to "defame" it would have to be untrue.

Unfortunately for Consentino it is, from what I have been told ALL TRUE. He WAS fired pursuant to an investigation of a sexual harassment complaint. and there was a settlement to avoid prosecution.

Do you seriously think that AFTER a $5,000 investigation the town immediately fired him and paid the dispatcher and her lawyer $100,000 because he did nothing wrong?

AtkinsonReporter2Monitor said...

phil consentino

Mark it is time to play truth or consequences are you willing to play

AtkinsonReporter2Monitor said...

Mark Acciard

LOL, Phil as you know I ALWAYS tell the truth. And I do not play games. Any time you wish to have a public discussion over the sexual harassment complaint that resulted in your firing, or your illegal investigation into the lives of your critics, or your illegal maintainance of civil files on all of us, Or your serial sexual harassment of female employee, let me know, I would LOVE to have this conversation IN PUBLIC..

BTW, Just try and threaten me the way you did Mr. Artus at candidates night.

AtkinsonReporter2Monitor said...

phil consentino

Why would you state that you do not want to me threaten. Your the only one that threatens people with law suits. Yes or no questions Did you win or loose??
yes no

One more question, I do not want to over burden you with too may all at once because this stroll down memory lane is going to take a LONG time. You can post what you want but REMEMBER I have documentations on every thing I say.

Last question remember yes or no answer
Were you ever summonsed into court

AtkinsonReporter2Monitor said...

Mark Acciard

Phil, that does not even make sense, however YOU threatened Mr. Artus at Candidates night, just as you threatened me at the post office a number of years ago.

And as for your documentation, whenever you find the stones to use them feel free. I can, as I always have PROVE everything I say.

Remember Phil the Court has had to order you to stop bullying harassing and intimidating your officers.

the Court has had to Order you to obey the law.

The Court has found you in contempt of court.

And after almost five years of serial sexual harassment your were fired pursuant to a complaint and investigation. You can never be a cop again. Nor be employed by the Town of Atkinson. rofl,

Tell me phil, what kind of man sexually harasses an employee who works right next to his wife?

AtkinsonReporter2Monitor said...

phil consentino

Mark, you sound nervers. You are trying to cover up my questions with OLD issues that again are not true. Question # 1, Please remember yes or no answer
Did you sue me, the town and the board of selectmen and did you win or lose. Now that is a simple question.

YES or NO
Let me make the second question a
little easier for you to respond.
have you ever been summons into court by me
YES OR NO

Last part remember do not beat around the bush
please answer YES or NO
Chief Consentino

AtkinsonReporter2Monitor said...

Mark Acciard

How could YOU possibly make me nervous, my egomaniacal bully? You can do no worse to me than you already have.

And how funny you are, you decry "old issues" then want to bring up old issues.

Here is our track record in Court.

I filed an injuction in 2004 to force you to obey the law.I won.

You disobeyed the Court Order and were found in contempt of Court. I win again.

You tried to appeal to the NH supreme Court, They dismissed I won again.

You sued me for slander, defamation of character, YOU withdrew the suit two
weeks before trial. I win again.

You kept up your bullying and I filed suit against you and the town. Then Artus filed suit, and the insurance company got them enjoined. I ran out of money and gave up. You win. frivolous tickets I win.

How funny you still sign as chief, when you got FIRED from that position for sexually harassing one of your employees, You have been whining for a year, that you never got to tell your side of that story, feel free. You ducked that question at candidates night, and threatened the person who asked it. Why not do it here?

AtkinsonReporter2Monitor said...

Tim_Belanger

Wow Mark... You two have a lot of history but it looks like you have got the last laugh again.... It looks like you exposed a lot more of this guy today than he would of ever wanted on a simple editorial by some elderly citizens. You win....

Anonymous said...

We all know that's not the chief but it's certainlly entertaining.

Anonymous said...

You are correct. He's NOT the Chief, but this exchange eas in the newspaper today, signed by himself.

Anonymous said...

I got a flyer outlining Consentino's disgusting behavior and I am not on the senior list. Everyone I know got one of these disgusting but hard to ignore flyers. The Murrreys are in denial and out of touch with reality and common decency.

Anonymous said...

"You sound nervers. Win or loose. Have you ever been summons? "

You voted him in.

Anonymous said...

It's outrageous that he actually ran for office after this latest crime. He is seriously unfit. The other two board members should ask for his resignation immediately.

Anonymous said...

The Murreys, by their own admission, are on the double secret senior enabler list.

Anonymous said...

WOW sure glad I moved out of Atkinson several years ago. This blog sure makes for entertaining reading.
I agree with Mark, based on my experiences with Consentino, he was certainly a poor excuse for a police chief

Anonymous said...

I read this letter going around that says in the victims own words what happened over and over. Spelled out in detail. It is disgusting what went on. Anyone like these two morons who defend these offences and conduct should read it again and show sympathy for the victim not the perpetrator.

What's amazing is the selectmen and town officials do not see the writing on the wall. This scandal will escalate till the time of resignation. Those who can read, like me. , are ashamed of all of them.

Anonymous said...

Consentino's CIRCLE of POWER



Woman abuser and Atkinson Selectman, Phil Consentino’s CIRCLE of POWER raises its nasty head.

Without a small army of get something for free acolytes the thug from Atkinson, former Police Chief and now Selectman Phil Consentino, would have nothing but free time on his hands – instead of that small object he let do his thinking for him, which is why he left the Atkinson Police Dept. in secret disgrace last year this time. That lawsuit thing which cost Atkinson taxpayer $100,000.00 we know of had a lot to do with it.

But, like with the couple who penned this disgraceful promotion below on behalf of the abuser, the Atkinson CIRCLE of POWER that keeps this pervert, if what is in the Complaint filed with the NH Human Rights Commission that forced his pals in the Atkinson Town Office to pay up and shut up, is true, it is the CIRCLE of POWER that is really to blame.

Here is the best the CoP brown-nosers could come up with in the lap dog Lawrence Eagle Tribune:

March 31, 2014

Letter: Anonymous mailing defames a good man

The Eagle-Tribune

To the editor:

To the anonymous person who has sent a second and very disgusting letter to the seniors of Atkinson: You have stolen the contact information given to the Police Department in conjunction with senior services. This was not meant for use in your crusade against former Police Chief Consentino. Take our names off your mailing list.

We have known Mr. Consentino for over 45 years and find him to be of the highest character. He is one of the kindest, most caring persons we have ever know and very professional at all times.

Get a life! Spend your time and postage money helping the poor or the homeless. We would tell you face to face, but you don’t have the courage to give a return address.

Denise and John Murrey

Atkinson

The Murrey’s have no problem kissing the posterior of Consentino with their LTE because he uses his public office and private charitable trust to buy friends and votes.

It’s a dirty business sticking up for Consentino – but the Atkinson CIRCLE of POWER is up to it.

I tried to post a little something about Consentino, with a touch of humor and truth, in the Lawrence Eagle Tribune, but alas, they will not let it past the Tribune’s CIRCLE of POWER that has always had a man-crush on Consentino the degenerate, if public documents about Consentino and the once secret sexual harassment settlement are to be believed

Let’s see how many Atkinson citizens are in the CIRCLE of POWER.

Ok, we have three so far.

Anonymous said...

It is awful that a private citizen that goes up against a bully has to drain his funds in a court battle while the town uses it's money to defend the people that caused the lawsuit.
Maybe we should get a citizens group together so we can collect moneys to fight against the people that we are supposed to trust to do the obvious. Especially when the states own supposedly again AG is on the friends list with the bully.

Anonymous said...

How many people did the Conman convince to have them include him into their wills. I heard the survivors of one of them were very upset with that happening to them knowing how the Conman works to feather his own pockets. These same people offended said the deceased were not of great wealth and were overseen by them. Yes, these now deceased took rides from the elderly service as would any one who was entitled to do so and not bother others to get from place to place.

Anonymous said...

3/31 @8:32 has said it all. They should ask him to resign immediately. They should tell and insist he do it or they will refuse to go to BOS meetings until he does. The next step should be to make the BOS board five members not the three controlling members it is now. Fair is fair is it not?

Anonymous said...

Consentino admitted in the paper that he threatened Leon Artus.

"You say I threatened Leon, get your story straight I spelt out MORT, were the threat, please explain or I win again about all your lies. SPEAK up or for ever hold your peace.

CHIEF"

Chief? The nerve of him. Do we need this ignorant bully running our Town?

Anonymous said...

"Mark do not ever say I can never be a cop again, again you LIE. I have no felony or any other charges against me can you say the same??? Your court cases were not frivolous the JUDGE FOUND YOU GUILTY. .

Well enough for today, but get your story straight i DID NOT threaten Leon I spelt out to him M O R T were is the threat. Nice talking to you see you tomorrow with more trips down memory lane.

Chief Consentino"


Spelling out the word death to a person using a menacing tone, is a threat.

Anonymous said...

phil consentino

Mark, please start telling the truth OK!!!!!
Why don't you speak to your buddy at police Standards and training, you know the one that you had a secret meeting at a dinner in Manchester. Tell every one that you filed a formal complaint against me for not having the proper training. That issue was thrown out with the rest of you lies. They came down to the P. D. and found that ALL of my training was up to there standards and my training went over and above their requirements. WERE do you get the information that I did not have the proper training??? I was allowed to continue as a part-time cop despite all of your actions to get me decertified, my training was up to date and I was in excellent standing with PS&T. Are you just making up lies as you go? What were your charges? you know that I know the reason you had charges brought against you.

Let's talk tomorrow, so far it looks like so far I win three to nothing. Nice of you to attend the selectman's meeting tonight. Looks like you have put on some weight. Why would a resident from Derry, if that is were you hang your hat doing at a BoS meeting in a town that you do not live in??
Let's talk tomorrow, and if we are going to play truth or consequences you must act like a big boy and start TELLING THE TRUTH...

CHIEF

Anonymous said...

phil consentino

Mark, I am new at this so bear with me. How do I reply to you.. Is it by email or on the blog.

I like it on email if our correspondence is made public or on the blog, let me know to get it my truth or consequence game out to the public.

Thank
CHIEF

Anonymous said...

THIS is who you elected folks!!

He will be his own undoing.

Anonymous said...

We can collect 50 signatures and hold a special town meeting to elect the two selectmen now. He needs to resign, he's out of control and had lost his mind.

Anonymous said...

Threatening a person by spelling out the word D E A TH in any language, at Candidates Night, in public, on camera, is permitted? If I spelled out MORT to Jim Gerrity the town moderator, in Deliberative Session, I bet my A$$ he would have the police put me in cuffs, remove me from Deliberative Session, then I would face criminal charges.

But if Jim Gerrity says it doesn't matter in Deliberative Session and the police will do nothing, then why can't anyone issue this threat to any other GOOD NEIGHBOR at the next Deliberative Session?

So Mr. Garrity, will you change your moderator rules to allow M O R T threats? You moderated the Candidates Night. You have said and contine to say....nothing.

Why did you allow your good neighbor to do it in public, on camera, at Candidates Night? Are you a disgusting hypocrite? Or just another disgusting enabler supporting an Atkinson selectman thug.

Anonymous said...

Ed Naile
Coalition NH Taxpayers

Here is a dilemma for the former, but still in his own mind, chief.

641:8 False Filing With the Director of Charitable Trusts. – A person shall be guilty of a class B felony if he knowingly makes a false entry in or false alteration of any registration statement, annual report or other information required to be filed with the director of charitable trusts.
Source. 1992, 239:3, eff. July 1, 1992.

Think this over.
I have.
Its a crimminal statute that fits you well.
CNHT has been going over your filings.

Anonymous said...

SOnce when does Garritty decide what is criminal and what is not. He doesn't.

Press the issue with the REAL Chief.

Anonymous said...

Mark give it a rest. If your not an Atkinson resident anymore your giving MY town a bad name. The voters voted. Move on.

Anonymous said...

You give the town a bad name! Keep it up Mark You are one of the few that have the balls to put your name to your posts.

Bill H

Anonymous said...

ED Naile
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
So last night the new board of Atkinson Selectmen decided to stop our official Coalition of NH Taxpayers photographer from recording thier meeting?
That really is doubling down on stupid.
And you have a NEW judge in your county now. Screwy Lewis retired after his last election ruling fiasco.
What are you thinking?

Anonymous said...

We all know that's illegal. Was there a vote?

Anonymous said...

To 3:18 - Does it matter where he lives? He gave more of himself to this town than most, even if only by sticking his neck out to stand against the corruption, let alone his service on budcom.

Consentino gives the town a bad name, and look how quickly it happened. There should be a qualifying exam accompanying every ballot.

Anonymous said...

4/1 @ 3:18, The town already has a BAD NAME if you didn't already know or maybe even notice that it does. Take your head out of the sand or from the bottle your drinking from. Dirty political atmosphere,self important people running things,sickening country wide fame and the laughing stock of the state all because of mainly one person and his followers. Your shame is not wanting to see the truth for what it is.

Anonymous said...

Oh no. Like we lost the moderator now we lose The TA. That photo guy will sue again. Betcha.

Anonymous said...

He should sue again. You cannot block anyone from taking photos or recording public meetings.

What happened to the TA? Has Conman replaced him with Mrs. Snicer?

Anonymous said...

Notice that the "sexual pervert" and "sexual predator" isn't complaining that he is guilty for assaulting a female under his command, he is only complaining that the proof of his guilt got out into the public domain.

Hey Consentino, if you didn't want to do the time, you shouldn't have done the crime.

You should be thanking your lucky stars you aren't in jail, because you gamed the system.

But remember, a sick person like yourself will do the crime again. Next time you won't be so lucky.

Save us all the embarrassment of having to go through another round of your perversion. Resign, leave town and never come back.

You will stand a better chance to find another victim for your perversion in a town where no one knows you. Till then, every woman (young and old) need to be reminded DAILY of the six pig you are. This needs to be done everyday till the day you die. You are UNFIT to be around and DECENT person.

UNFIT, UNFIT, UNFIT!

Anonymous said...

IMHO, the dispatcher should now press charges because he is now again her boss and by definition she IS working in a hostile environment.

Anonymous said...

IOW, he broke the spirit and intent of their agreement, i.e., to be rid of him in exchange for his disappearance.

Anonymous said...

Defamation has to be about something NOT true about a person. Consentino would have to show that he did NOT do what he was alleged to do. Now how can he do that? He can if he's willing to open the Cunningham case, but he can't do that, he's sworn to secrecy by the agreement. What I don't get is WHY he came back. He has everything to lose now AND the Town CANNOT foot the legal bill.

Anonymous said...

why is conman so concerned about leaked info when he has been illegally investigating his perceived political opponents for decades? why did he allegedly go around showing fred childs expunged record for bande?

Anonymous said...

So much for the gag order on the settlement. Maybe the members of this blog can help Lyn pay back the settlement.

Anonymous said...

I will help so now we can put him where he belongs in JAIL!

Anonymous said...

I read in the Eagle Tribune that our pig. ,xpig whatever, says he hired a private investigator! Has suspects in the crosshairs. Hmmmm. How do you square it you investigate ,privately your sexual harrashment victim? Special since you tried to vestigate late night in the police station bathroom already,,,, real private investigation and it cost the Atkinson taxpayers $100,000.00 for your findings, hahaha

Now how will you investigate your poor girl victim again, how will your private dicks measure her willingness to comply with your latest demands? Will they pat down the usual suspects???? How will they feel up the facts????

Anonymous said...

ATKINSON SELECTMAN HIRES PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS.

RIGHT. Movfe critics of Elderly affairs move now. MOVE OUR WE GIT YOU GONE FOR GOOD!

Anonymous said...

The question & answer has to be the whys and who let out the information. If it were the woman that got her justified award then maybe she doesn't really care for about the award given her. If this be the case I can only see and agree with her in the never ending quest to get rid of the Conman from all town official duties. If it is anyone else then I can see why they want to get rid of the Conman because of their wanting the town to be rid of the corrupt ways of running the town . The past maybe the past but it will always be remembered for the to many to mention varied costs and failings of its officials to act to have prevented this. The best thing for the pervert to do is to resign and fade away from politics and forget about even trying to get his now blacken name back because he was fired for just cause. That being accused and justly fired for sexual conduct in the work place.

Anonymous said...

To 8:24 - Why should Lynne pay anything back? The Town hired him, elected him and tolerated him while this woman was violated. She deserves the money and much more. I say, she should press charges now that he's back. I am behind her and I'll bet most of the Officers that witnessed these things will back her up.

Anonymous said...

I think someone let this out because he ran for Selectman, to prevent him from winning but he did. I cannot for the life of me understand who'd vote for someone after this got out. They can doubt the information, but he was fired, he won't say why, he is openly talking about retaliation. How much info does a person need to not put a questionable character in charge of the Town? For me, it doesn't take much to pass him over.

Anonymous said...

8:24 I don't I think the woman should have to pay the money back either. I also think she did not leak any information why would she jepardize her settlement. Frankly, I think she got ripped off 50000 is nothing for what she had to endure for 5 years..unfortunately she probably has a better case know which will cost us the taxpayers more money and this time I would get a better attorney to sue the town of that Atkinson for having to work in hostile environment. make sure this time she set for life.

Anonymous said...

Who would want that type of detail in the public? She didn't leak it, IMO, someone who had access and didn't want him to return to politics did it.

She should sue and press charges.

Anonymous said...

How do we know it wasn't done purposely by the Conman or at his direction to suit his own screwball reasons?